Hi, @bucko13
What do you think about this?
Current State
the repository depnds on two major versions of bitcoinjs-lib:
- v5.1.10
@caravan/bitcoin
@caravan/wallets
- v6.1.5
@caravan/psbt
@caravan/transactions
this results in duplicated dependncies, incompatible types, and incresed maintenance overhead
Duplicate PSBT Implementations
Two independent PsbtV2 implemntations exist:
@caravan/bitcoin/src/psbtv2.ts
@caravan/psbt/src/psbtv2/*
The v6 implementation is actively used and supports features not present in the v5 version
The v5-based implementation appears unused and redndant.
Issues
- multiple versions of the same core dependency
- type incompatibilities across package boundaries
- duplicated PSBT logic
- implicit and inconsistently enforced ECC initialzation
Proposed Direction
- standardize all packages on
bitcoinjs-lib@^6.1.5
- migrate remaining v5-dependent code
- deprecate and remove PSBT exports from
@caravan/bitcoin
- treat
@caravan/psbt as the single PSBT implementation
- remove all v5 dependencies and aliases
If this direction makes sense to you, i am willing to start working on the migraton and consolidation outlined above
let me know if you would like me to proced, or if you would prefer any scope adjustments before implementation.
Hi, @bucko13
What do you think about this?
Current State
the repository depnds on two major versions of
bitcoinjs-lib:@caravan/bitcoin@caravan/wallets@caravan/psbt@caravan/transactionsthis results in duplicated dependncies, incompatible types, and incresed maintenance overhead
Duplicate PSBT Implementations
Two independent PsbtV2 implemntations exist:
@caravan/bitcoin/src/psbtv2.ts@caravan/psbt/src/psbtv2/*The v6 implementation is actively used and supports features not present in the v5 version
The v5-based implementation appears unused and redndant.
Issues
Proposed Direction
bitcoinjs-lib@^6.1.5@caravan/bitcoin@caravan/psbtas the single PSBT implementationIf this direction makes sense to you, i am willing to start working on the migraton and consolidation outlined above
let me know if you would like me to proced, or if you would prefer any scope adjustments before implementation.