Objective
Track the repo hygiene that should wait until the surrounding Odoo system and runtime-target repos stabilize, so cleanup does not fight active cross-repo movement.
Finish Line
MCP docs/config/env discovery align with the stable Odoo runtime repos
Current Status
State: Waiting.
Next action: Revisit after the Odoo tenant/workflow stabilization issues settle, then inventory stale docs/config/runtime discovery against the stable target repos.
Blocked by: Launchplane/Odoo tenant orchestration and target-shape stabilization.
Last verified: 2026-05-04; issue #8 was reviewed and the remaining cleanup was judged real but premature while dependent repos are changing.
Scope
- Reconcile
README.md, AGENTS.md, .github/github.json, and test docs after the target Odoo runtime shape is stable.
- Replace or remove default discovery paths and messages that still point at retired
odoo-ai, unless explicitly retained for archival investigation.
- Decide the durable local IDE/config policy and clean
.gitignore / tracked .idea leftovers accordingly.
- Remove stale comments, generated artifacts, dead fixtures, and obsolete docs found during a fresh inventory pass.
- Keep behavior changes small and justified by cleanup safety.
Acceptance Criteria
- MCP target discovery and docs point at the current live Odoo workspace/runtime repos, not retired defaults.
- Any retained compatibility path is explicit, tested, and documented as non-default.
.gitignore, tracked IDE files, generated artifacts, and local-only leftovers have a clear intentional policy.
- README, AGENTS, tests docs, and workflow metadata agree on commands and cleanup expectations.
- Normal repo gates pass after each cleanup PR.
Relationships
Validation
Use .github/github.json as the source for validation commands. At cleanup time, run the documented no-live-stack gate first, then run live-stack validation only when the target Odoo workspace is expected to be available.
Decisions
- Do not clean up default Odoo target discovery while the Odoo system target shape is actively changing.
- Keep future cleanup in focused PRs rather than broad mixed behavior/doc/config churn.
Open Questions
- What is the canonical default target repo or workspace once Launchplane and tenant orchestration settle?
- Should any
odoo-ai compatibility remain as explicit archival support, or be fully removed from runtime discovery?
Objective
Track the repo hygiene that should wait until the surrounding Odoo system and runtime-target repos stabilize, so cleanup does not fight active cross-repo movement.
Finish Line
MCP docs/config/env discovery align with the stable Odoo runtime repos
Current Status
State: Waiting.
Next action: Revisit after the Odoo tenant/workflow stabilization issues settle, then inventory stale docs/config/runtime discovery against the stable target repos.
Blocked by: Launchplane/Odoo tenant orchestration and target-shape stabilization.
Last verified: 2026-05-04; issue #8 was reviewed and the remaining cleanup was judged real but premature while dependent repos are changing.
Scope
README.md,AGENTS.md,.github/github.json, and test docs after the target Odoo runtime shape is stable.odoo-ai, unless explicitly retained for archival investigation..gitignore/ tracked.idealeftovers accordingly.Acceptance Criteria
.gitignore, tracked IDE files, generated artifacts, and local-only leftovers have a clear intentional policy.Relationships
Validation
Use
.github/github.jsonas the source for validation commands. At cleanup time, run the documented no-live-stack gate first, then run live-stack validation only when the target Odoo workspace is expected to be available.Decisions
Open Questions
odoo-aicompatibility remain as explicit archival support, or be fully removed from runtime discovery?