You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi
I'm using a curated universe file and I noticed some changes in the model generated from it, specifically changes in chemical formulas.
Is this related to the optimization method cited in this previous issue or is this another thing?
- There is a new optimization method that tries to automatically balance reactions when the formulae are incorrect or inconsistent. It assumes that some formulae are incorrect and minimizes the number of formulae that it needs to change.
This is mostly an heuristic approach, so it is possible that it will also introduce mistakes in some formulae.
This curation happens during the creation of the universal model, not during the carving process, so there shouldn't be differences at the level of metadata between the universal model and the generated models... It is a bit strange that this is happening.
Hi all, I've also run into an issue recently that might be related to this. After updating to the latest version (having previously used 1.5.0), I noticed substantial changes in the model generated from the same genome file. As an example, in the new model there are a lot of transport reactions that are only connected to single periplasmic metabolites causing them to be interpreted by COBRA as exchanges. I'm not sure if this could be related to changes in how the formulas are balanced or otherwise. Happy to provide model outputs for more context - thank you!
Hi
I'm using a curated universe file and I noticed some changes in the model generated from it, specifically changes in chemical formulas.
Is this related to the optimization method cited in this previous issue or is this another thing?
Originally posted by @cdanielmachado in #136 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: