Skip to content

web service additions to support StationJSON #13

@crotwell

Description

@crotwell

Depending on how it evolves, this may require either extensions to the fdsn station ws or perhaps a completely separate service. What that means depends a lot on whether StationJSON continues to look just like StationXML or if it adopts a JsonApi style, ie #1 and #2

If it stays as a json version of xml, then maybe little need change. But if moves to JsonApi then I think a tightly coupled web service might be very useful. In particular some thought should be given to how sub-objects (ie individual response stage or channel) are identified/referenced from other objects. Current ids tend to be long-lived and meaningful, but this may not be optimal in a shorter term transactional scenario, where something like integer database ids may be more efficient.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions