You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
pr-status: expose the release plan as a structured output #690
pr-status already computes the full release plan (via @changesets/get-release-plan) to build its comment, then only exposes comment-body. Could it also surface that same data as structured outputs?
These would be suuuper useful:
max-bump: the highest of major/minor/patch across the released packages, or none
releases: JSON array of { name, type, oldVersion, newVersion } per package
The current code for this action already carries all of this (per-package type plus old and new versions), so nothing new needs computing.
I currently label a PR patch/minor/major from the bump by manually parsing the files in the .changesets folder. The code for that would become much simpler if I could get these outputs directly. And this action already handles the pull_request_target fork-safety, so I wouldn't have to worry about that.
I already have a draft locally for this, but I wanted to check if this is something you'd be open to before I submit it. If so, I can clean it up and submit a PR. Pls lmk!
Sounds reasonable. We should probably wait until we land this #689 to decide how to expose this information here (this would ensure we'd expose those kind of outsputs in a consistent way)
Activity
Andarist commentedon Jul 2, 2026
Sounds reasonable. We should probably wait until we land this #689 to decide how to expose this information here (this would ensure we'd expose those kind of outsputs in a consistent way)
materwelonDhruv commentedon Jul 2, 2026
Oki. I wonder if there's a way to watch a PR. Either way, will get back to this once 689 is resolved 👍🏻
beeequeue commentedon Jul 2, 2026
there should be a
Subscribebutton on the right. 🙂materwelonDhruv commentedon Jul 2, 2026
omg 😭 my brain just filtered that out given how many times I've looked at it and NOT used it.
materwelonDhruv commentedon Jul 24, 2026
#689 just got resolved 😄 are you okay with me opening a PR for this @Andarist ?
Andarist commentedon Jul 24, 2026
sure, go ahead