Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

The CLA instructions should say a human reviews each request #854

Closed
2 tasks done
kathatherine opened this issue Apr 24, 2023 · 2 comments · Fixed by #855
Closed
2 tasks done

The CLA instructions should say a human reviews each request #854

kathatherine opened this issue Apr 24, 2023 · 2 comments · Fixed by #855
Labels
locked [bot] locked due to inactivity type::documentation request for improved documentation

Comments

@kathatherine
Copy link
Contributor

Checklist

  • I added a descriptive title
  • I searched open reports and couldn't find a duplicate

What happened?

The CLA signing widget on https://conda.io/en/latest/contributing.html#conda-contributor-license-agreement should have some text added to the paragraph above it stating that each agreement is ultimately reviewed by a human and may take some time to be approved. This would reduce the number of redundant signings from users who just think something went wrong, and would reduce overall confusion.

Conda Info

No response

Conda Config

No response

Conda list

No response

Additional Context

No response
@kathatherine kathatherine added the type::bug describes erroneous operation, use severity::* to classify the type label Apr 24, 2023
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to 🆕 New in 🧭 Planning Apr 24, 2023
@kathatherine kathatherine added type::documentation request for improved documentation and removed type::bug describes erroneous operation, use severity::* to classify the type labels Apr 24, 2023
@kenodegard
Copy link
Contributor

The CLA bot update seeks to make this more clear too (linking the contributor to the associated PR etc)

conda/actions#91

@kenodegard kenodegard mentioned this issue Apr 24, 2023
Merged
3 tasks
@kathatherine
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yeah, two of our PyCon sprint newbies got hung up on their CLA signings not resolving immediately after they signed them, and didn't read the bot text after the link you're supposed to click, so I thought adding an extra note to the actual signing page would help.

@kenodegard kenodegard mentioned this issue Apr 27, 2023
Merged
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from 🆕 New to 🏁 Done in 🧭 Planning Dec 6, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked [bot] locked due to inactivity label Aug 20, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 20, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
locked [bot] locked due to inactivity type::documentation request for improved documentation
Projects
🧭 Planning
Archived in project
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Added extra context for CLA signing conda/conda-docs
2 participants
@kenodegard @kathatherine