+The object stays `ACTIVE` throughout because the Python-side object is still valid: it has a live native pointer, its public methods still work, and callers may continue using it (e.g. reading the updated manifest or feeding in another fragment). The lifecycle state does not change because from `ManagedResource`'s perspective nothing has closed. Only the underlying native pointer has been swapped. This is different from `_mark_consumed()`, where the object transitions to `CLOSED` and becomes unusable. The old pointer must not be freed by `ManagedResource` because the native library already consumed it as part of the FFI call.
0 commit comments