Updated comment on issue 4484 (#531)

Author: tomaszkam

xml/issue4484.xml

@@ -19,7 +19,9 @@ but per <sref ref="[temp.param]"/>/13, a template parameter object must be of a
 
 <note>2025-11-27; Tomasz comments</note>
 <p>
-This was on core side by LWG <iref ref="4437"/>. The usage of the term template parameter object is intended (uniqueness).
+The template argument object defintion was extended to cover objects of array types by CWG 3111.
+The usage of the term "template parameter object" is intentional here, as it guarantees that
+`reflect_constant_string` produces the same objects, where their content is the same.
 </p>
 </discussion>