Use this guide to maintain consistent style across the Secretless Broker project.
Generally, when you are contributing code changes to this project you should leverage golint as you work to get suggestions for style fixes you should make.
To use golint
on any project path, run
go install golang.org/x/lint/golint@latest
golint ./[path]/...
If you’re editing code, take a few minutes to look at the code around you and determine its style. If they use spaces around all their arithmetic operators, you should too. If their comments have little boxes of hash marks around them, make your comments have little boxes of hash marks around them too.
The point of having style guidelines is to have a common vocabulary of coding so people can concentrate on what you’re saying rather than on how you’re saying it. We present global style rules here so people know the vocabulary, but local style is also important. If code you add to a file looks drastically different from the existing code around it, it throws readers out of their rhythm when they go to read it. Avoid this.
Secretless Broker prose should be warm, direct, and clear about its intended audience. When editing copy, follow the Chicago Manual of Style.
Documentation is written to be familiar with the reader. Use you & your to refer to the reader, we us & our to refer to the contributors.
When giving examples, use a generic example that the reader can relate to. For example: a website connecting to a database.
Give names to machines according to their function, eg
database-server
. Give names to humans using the alphabetical
convention common in cryptography research.
When writing tests, treat your descriptions as prose to be read and understood by humans.
Secretless Broker code favors readability over cleverness.
Consider the guidelines in The Ten-Factor CI Job.
If this guide is lacking, please feel free to open a pull request to include additional guidelines.
Good guideline are:
-
Distinctive
The reader can tell which part of the guide covers the project they're working on.
-
Definitive
The readers can distinguish whether their work follows the guidelines or not.
-
Actionable
The reader has clear guidance on how to improve content that doesn't follow the style.