Allow type converters to be defined at class-level to allow override of superclass field converters

[andyjefferson]

With a JPA @convert we can then do

public class BaseClass
{
    @Convert(converter=MyConv1.class)
    MyType myField;
}

@Convert(attributeName="myField", converter=MyConv2.class)
public class SubClass
{
    ...
}

This will mean that when checking if a field has a converter we need to go via the ClassMetaData, which will find out for the member, firstly checking for class-level overrides, then member specifications.

[clr-apache]

I believe that the member (field/property) annotation should override the type (class) default specification. So by default, if a member is of a type that is defined as having a converter and has no annotation, the member uses that converter. But a member could still override that default by explicitly naming a different converter via an annotation.