Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

【跟踪】6.12 系列合并 6.6 补丁情况一览 #11

Open
MingcongBai opened this issue Nov 12, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

【跟踪】6.12 系列合并 6.6 补丁情况一览 #11

MingcongBai opened this issue Nov 12, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@MingcongBai
Copy link

MingcongBai commented Nov 12, 2024

本工单用于跟踪从 6.6 分支引入的厂商补丁的移植情况,本次移植后,补丁后续将以 cherry-pick 的形式变基到各 rolling-stable 最新分支

下方缩进项指代顶层依赖项

当前代码基础

6.12.9

外设支持类(显卡)

外设支持类(网卡)

外设支持类(输入)

外设支持类(存储)

平台支持类(飞腾)

平台支持类(鲲鹏)

平台支持类(AArch64 通用)

平台支持类(龙架构)

平台支持类(海光)

平台支持类(兆芯)

平台支持类(Intel)

平台支持类(其他 x86 厂商)

平台支持类(x86 通用)

平台支持类(RISC-V 通用)

平台支持类(申威)

平台支持类(MIPS)

平台支持类(通用)

发布管理类

@MingcongBai MingcongBai pinned this issue Nov 12, 2024
MingcongBai pushed a commit that referenced this issue Nov 18, 2024
Disable strict aliasing, as has been done in the kernel proper for decades
(literally since before git history) to fix issues where gcc will optimize
away loads in code that looks 100% correct, but is _technically_ undefined
behavior, and thus can be thrown away by the compiler.

E.g. arm64's vPMU counter access test casts a uint64_t (unsigned long)
pointer to a u64 (unsigned long long) pointer when setting PMCR.N via
u64p_replace_bits(), which gcc-13 detects and optimizes away, i.e. ignores
the result and uses the original PMCR.

The issue is most easily observed by making set_pmcr_n() noinline and
wrapping the call with printf(), e.g. sans comments, for this code:

  printf("orig = %lx, next = %lx, want = %lu\n", pmcr_orig, pmcr, pmcr_n);
  set_pmcr_n(&pmcr, pmcr_n);
  printf("orig = %lx, next = %lx, want = %lu\n", pmcr_orig, pmcr, pmcr_n);

gcc-13 generates:

 0000000000401c90 <set_pmcr_n>:
  401c90:       f9400002        ldr     x2, [x0]
  401c94:       b3751022        bfi     x2, x1, #11, #5
  401c98:       f9000002        str     x2, [x0]
  401c9c:       d65f03c0        ret

 0000000000402660 <test_create_vpmu_vm_with_pmcr_n>:
  402724:       aa1403e3        mov     x3, x20
  402728:       aa1503e2        mov     x2, x21
  40272c:       aa1603e0        mov     x0, x22
  402730:       aa1503e1        mov     x1, x21
  402734:       940060ff        bl      41ab30 <_IO_printf>
  402738:       aa1403e1        mov     x1, x20
  40273c:       910183e0        add     x0, sp, #0x60
  402740:       97fffd54        bl      401c90 <set_pmcr_n>
  402744:       aa1403e3        mov     x3, x20
  402748:       aa1503e2        mov     x2, x21
  40274c:       aa1503e1        mov     x1, x21
  402750:       aa1603e0        mov     x0, x22
  402754:       940060f7        bl      41ab30 <_IO_printf>

with the value stored in [sp + 0x60] ignored by both printf() above and
in the test proper, resulting in a false failure due to vcpu_set_reg()
simply storing the original value, not the intended value.

  $ ./vpmu_counter_access
  Random seed: 0x6b8b4567
  orig = 3040, next = 3040, want = 0
  orig = 3040, next = 3040, want = 0
  ==== Test Assertion Failure ====
    aarch64/vpmu_counter_access.c:505: pmcr_n == get_pmcr_n(pmcr)
    pid=71578 tid=71578 errno=9 - Bad file descriptor
       1        0x400673: run_access_test at vpmu_counter_access.c:522
       2         (inlined by) main at vpmu_counter_access.c:643
       3        0x4132d7: __libc_start_call_main at libc-start.o:0
       4        0x413653: __libc_start_main at ??:0
       5        0x40106f: _start at ??:0
    Failed to update PMCR.N to 0 (received: 6)

Somewhat bizarrely, gcc-11 also exhibits the same behavior, but only if
set_pmcr_n() is marked noinline, whereas gcc-13 fails even if set_pmcr_n()
is inlined in its sole caller.

Cc: [email protected]
Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116912
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <[email protected]>
@opsiff
Copy link
Member

opsiff commented Nov 19, 2024

deepin-community/kernel#461 已合入6.12版本 不需要了

@Avenger-285714
Copy link
Collaborator

deepin-community/kernel#348 has merged upstream. And linux-stable has picked it to 4.19/5.4/5.10/5.15/6.1/6.6 :-)

MingcongBai pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 18, 2025
[ Upstream commit 58f038e ]

During the update procedure, when overwrite element in a pre-allocated
htab, the freeing of old_element is protected by the bucket lock. The
reason why the bucket lock is necessary is that the old_element has
already been stashed in htab->extra_elems after alloc_htab_elem()
returns. If freeing the old_element after the bucket lock is unlocked,
the stashed element may be reused by concurrent update procedure and the
freeing of old_element will run concurrently with the reuse of the
old_element. However, the invocation of check_and_free_fields() may
acquire a spin-lock which violates the lockdep rule because its caller
has already held a raw-spin-lock (bucket lock). The following warning
will be reported when such race happens:

  BUG: scheduling while atomic: test_progs/676/0x00000003
  3 locks held by test_progs/676:
  #0: ffffffff864b0240 (rcu_read_lock_trace){....}-{0:0}, at: bpf_prog_test_run_syscall+0x2c0/0x830
  #1: ffff88810e961188 (&htab->lockdep_key){....}-{2:2}, at: htab_map_update_elem+0x306/0x1500
  #2: ffff8881f4eac1b8 (&base->softirq_expiry_lock){....}-{2:2}, at: hrtimer_cancel_wait_running+0xe9/0x1b0
  Modules linked in: bpf_testmod(O)
  Preemption disabled at:
  [<ffffffff817837a3>] htab_map_update_elem+0x293/0x1500
  CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 676 Comm: test_progs Tainted: G ... 6.12.0+ #11
  Tainted: [W]=WARN, [O]=OOT_MODULE
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)...
  Call Trace:
  <TASK>
  dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x70
  dump_stack+0x10/0x20
  __schedule_bug+0x120/0x170
  __schedule+0x300c/0x4800
  schedule_rtlock+0x37/0x60
  rtlock_slowlock_locked+0x6d9/0x54c0
  rt_spin_lock+0x168/0x230
  hrtimer_cancel_wait_running+0xe9/0x1b0
  hrtimer_cancel+0x24/0x30
  bpf_timer_delete_work+0x1d/0x40
  bpf_timer_cancel_and_free+0x5e/0x80
  bpf_obj_free_fields+0x262/0x4a0
  check_and_free_fields+0x1d0/0x280
  htab_map_update_elem+0x7fc/0x1500
  bpf_prog_9f90bc20768e0cb9_overwrite_cb+0x3f/0x43
  bpf_prog_ea601c4649694dbd_overwrite_timer+0x5d/0x7e
  bpf_prog_test_run_syscall+0x322/0x830
  __sys_bpf+0x135d/0x3ca0
  __x64_sys_bpf+0x75/0xb0
  x64_sys_call+0x1b5/0xa10
  do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0
  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53
  ...
  </TASK>

It seems feasible to break the reuse and refill of per-cpu extra_elems
into two independent parts: reuse the per-cpu extra_elems with bucket
lock being held and refill the old_element as per-cpu extra_elems after
the bucket lock is unlocked. However, it will make the concurrent
overwrite procedures on the same CPU return unexpected -E2BIG error when
the map is full.

Therefore, the patch fixes the lock problem by breaking the cancelling
of bpf_timer into two steps for PREEMPT_RT:
1) use hrtimer_try_to_cancel() and check its return value
2) if the timer is running, use hrtimer_cancel() through a kworker to
   cancel it again
Considering that the current implementation of hrtimer_cancel() will try
to acquire a being held softirq_expiry_lock when the current timer is
running, these steps above are reasonable. However, it also has
downside. When the timer is running, the cancelling of the timer is
delayed when releasing the last map uref. The delay is also fixable
(e.g., break the cancelling of bpf timer into two parts: one part in
locked scope, another one in unlocked scope), it can be revised later if
necessary.

It is a bit hard to decide the right fix tag. One reason is that the
problem depends on PREEMPT_RT which is enabled in v6.12. Considering the
softirq_expiry_lock lock exists since v5.4 and bpf_timer is introduced
in v5.15, the bpf_timer commit is used in the fixes tag and an extra
depends-on tag is added to state the dependency on PREEMPT_RT.

Fixes: b00628b ("bpf: Introduce bpf timers.")
Depends-on: v6.12+ with PREEMPT_RT enabled
Reported-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <[email protected]>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
MingcongBai pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 18, 2025
[ Upstream commit c7b87ce ]

libtraceevent parses and returns an array of argument fields, sometimes
larger than RAW_SYSCALL_ARGS_NUM (6) because it includes "__syscall_nr",
idx will traverse to index 6 (7th element) whereas sc->fmt->arg holds 6
elements max, creating an out-of-bounds access. This runtime error is
found by UBsan. The error message:

  $ sudo UBSAN_OPTIONS=print_stacktrace=1 ./perf trace -a --max-events=1
  builtin-trace.c:1966:35: runtime error: index 6 out of bounds for type 'syscall_arg_fmt [6]'
    #0 0x5c04956be5fe in syscall__alloc_arg_fmts /home/howard/hw/linux-perf/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c:1966
    #1 0x5c04956c0510 in trace__read_syscall_info /home/howard/hw/linux-perf/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c:2110
    #2 0x5c04956c372b in trace__syscall_info /home/howard/hw/linux-perf/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c:2436
    #3 0x5c04956d2f39 in trace__init_syscalls_bpf_prog_array_maps /home/howard/hw/linux-perf/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c:3897
    #4 0x5c04956d6d25 in trace__run /home/howard/hw/linux-perf/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c:4335
    #5 0x5c04956e112e in cmd_trace /home/howard/hw/linux-perf/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c:5502
    #6 0x5c04956eda7d in run_builtin /home/howard/hw/linux-perf/tools/perf/perf.c:351
    #7 0x5c04956ee0a8 in handle_internal_command /home/howard/hw/linux-perf/tools/perf/perf.c:404
    #8 0x5c04956ee37f in run_argv /home/howard/hw/linux-perf/tools/perf/perf.c:448
    #9 0x5c04956ee8e9 in main /home/howard/hw/linux-perf/tools/perf/perf.c:556
    #10 0x79eb3622a3b7 in __libc_start_call_main ../sysdeps/nptl/libc_start_call_main.h:58
    #11 0x79eb3622a47a in __libc_start_main_impl ../csu/libc-start.c:360
    #12 0x5c04955422d4 in _start (/home/howard/hw/linux-perf/tools/perf/perf+0x4e02d4) (BuildId: 5b6cab2d59e96a4341741765ad6914a4d784dbc6)

     0.000 ( 0.014 ms): Chrome_ChildIO/117244 write(fd: 238, buf: !, count: 1)                                      = 1

Fixes: 5e58fcf ("perf trace: Allow allocating sc->arg_fmt even without the syscall tracepoint")
Signed-off-by: Howard Chu <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants