We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
It looks like sometimes gist -l does not correctly fetch the filenames / description of a Gist.
gist -l
This tends to happen more with (secret) gists, but since some (secret) gists DO have file lists and a description, this seems like a bug.
(secret)
Here's an example:
$ gist -l ... https://gist.github.com/8efe8fc99e0a62804fe6646e13f8a292 (secret) ...
However, if you go to that Gist, you see that it only has a single file (for-jmcantrell.txt) -- but the filename is not printed.
for-jmcantrell.txt
Other Secret gists show the filename or description, for example:
https://gist.github.com/768ebfb72dc37dc2cf88 asdf (secret) # Shows description, but no filenames -- probably fine https://gist.github.com/9fb02a9994ae6a66ca05 win.py (secret) # Shows filename
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
It looks like sometimes
gist -l
does not correctly fetch the filenames / description of a Gist.This tends to happen more with
(secret)
gists, but since some(secret)
gists DO have file lists and a description, this seems like a bug.Here's an example:
However, if you go to that Gist, you see that it only has a single file (
for-jmcantrell.txt
) -- but the filename is not printed.Other Secret gists show the filename or description, for example:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: