Skip to content

feat: divine fork scaffolding (CI, ownership, docs)#1

Merged
mbradley merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
divine/evaluation
May 13, 2026
Merged

feat: divine fork scaffolding (CI, ownership, docs)#1
mbradley merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
divine/evaluation

Conversation

@mbradley
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@mbradley mbradley commented May 7, 2026

Context & Requests for Reviewers

Initial divine-specific scaffolding for the divinevideo/coop fork.

  • build-and-push.yaml: builds coop-server, coop-worker, coop-client images to ghcr.io/divinevideo/ on pushes to main and divine/* branches
  • semantic_pr.yml: conventional commit enforcement (matches all other divine repos)
  • CODEOWNERS: divine team reviewers
  • CLAUDE.md: updated from "evaluation" framing to production review surface with staging deployment notes and cross-repo coordination pointers
  • PR template: added public artifact review checkbox

Tests

No code changes. CI workflows are additive. Existing apply_pr_checks.yaml is unchanged.

Rollout Plan

Merge to main triggers the first image build. K8s manifests in divine-iac-coreconfig will reference the resulting images.

Public Artifact Review

  • Titles, descriptions, branch names, screenshots, and linked artifacts avoid partner, customer, brand, campaign, or other sensitive external names unless explicitly approved

mbradley added 2 commits May 3, 2026 13:57
Add build-and-push workflow to publish coop-server, coop-worker, and
coop-client images to ghcr.io/divinevideo/. Update CODEOWNERS for divine
team, add semantic PR enforcement, update CLAUDE.md to reflect COOP as
divine's production review surface with staging deployment notes.
@mbradley mbradley requested review from dcadenas and irab May 13, 2026 13:01
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@dcadenas dcadenas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

✅ CI and ownership are lined up

@mbradley mbradley merged commit bc661be into main May 13, 2026
11 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants