Non-static opCall hides struct and union default constructors

[MetaLang]

struct Test
{
    Test opCall()
    {
        return Test();
    }
}

void main()
{
    Test(); // Error: calling non-static function `opCall` requires an instance of type `Test`
}

The call Test(); in the main function should be interpreted as default construction of a new Test instance. However, it is incorrectly interpreted as a static call to the non-static opCall defined in Test.

Note that this does not occur for classes, due to the required use of the new keyword to construct them.

If the struct or a union defines a no-arg constructor, the compiler will correctly interpret Test() as a call to an illegal no-arg constructor and report an error. If it defines an N-arg constructor, the compiler will interpret Test() as a new default-initialized instance of Test.

[Gauravsh-24]

Hello @MetaLang
I would like to work on this issue. can you please assign to me.