Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Consider incorporating SimdBase64 #107816

Open
stephentoub opened this issue Sep 13, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Consider incorporating SimdBase64 #107816

stephentoub opened this issue Sep 13, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
area-System.Runtime
Milestone
10.0.0

Comments

@stephentoub
Copy link
Member

https://github.com/simdutf/SimdBase64 claims measurably faster Base64 decoding speeds than what's currently in .NET 9. We should consider switching over to that implementation or a variation thereof.
@stephentoub stephentoub added this to the 10.0.0 milestone Sep 13, 2024
@dotnet-issue-labeler dotnet-issue-labeler bot added the needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners label Sep 13, 2024
@vcsjones vcsjones added area-System.Runtime and removed needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners labels Sep 13, 2024
@dotnet-policy-service Dotnet Policy Service
Copy link
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-system-runtime
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

@lemire
Copy link

lemire commented Sep 15, 2024

Support for VBMI2 in the runtime (#88946) would make it profitable to add AVX-512 support to SimdBase64.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
area-System.Runtime
Projects
None yet
Milestone
10.0.0
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@vcsjones @lemire @stephentoub