Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

do_heartbeat (--no-heartbeat) in testing version 3.3.0 #126

Closed
Shmi911 opened this issue Sep 14, 2021 · 5 comments
Closed

do_heartbeat (--no-heartbeat) in testing version 3.3.0 #126

Shmi911 opened this issue Sep 14, 2021 · 5 comments

Comments

@Shmi911
Copy link

Shmi911 commented Sep 14, 2021

Hello, quick question.

Can we hope for the "do_heartbeat" function (--no-heartbeat argument) to be implemented into the "testing" version (currently 3.3.0) of PyInstaLive?

Is there a reason why it didn't get implemented yet (as it is in the master version)?

Thank you in advance.

@dvingerh
Copy link
Owner

Because I intend to largely restructure and rewrite the code and it'll be added back when that's done. But I currently don't have any interest in working on this project because I don't personally have a need for it anymore.
The test version has working new authentication that does not rely on an unmaintained API module which was really all I planned on changing but I ended up having to rewrite a bunch of functions anyway to make it work again.
Maybe i'll work on it again when I have a bunch of extra time on my hands but for all intents and purposes do consider this project inactive.

@Jeffade1
Copy link

@dvingerh Interesting. PyInstaLive is so, so useful for all those who're monitoring the Instagram livestreams 24/24. The only tool doing the job properly.
Hope you'll find a bit of time for fixing/developping and we'll have the opportunity in the future to see a new pyinstalive_win.exe in the releases but anyway a big thanks to you💯👍

@afterdelight
Copy link

i think its already implemented now, but im not sure

@afterdelight
Copy link

why did you close this?

@dvingerh
Copy link
Owner

See #134 (comment)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants