Skip to content

Tolerate missing types in more positions? #2658

@stephan-herrmann

Description

@stephan-herrmann

In #2543 I focused on methods as a reason for undesired lookup of a missing type.

Perhaps a similar story could also unfold for fields?

Also parameters of any super types may refer to missing types which possibly (?) can be ignored in some cases?

Metadata

Metadata

Labels

compilerEclipse Java Compiler (ecj) related issues

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions