A silly mistake but the compiler wasn't helpful with `type` error

[badlydrawnrob]

Quick Summary: Working too late into the night and stupidly used a type alias in the model record (without any arguments). The compiler caught the bug but error wasn't so useful (as in, I didn't know where to look when trying to fix it). Right now if you're not careful you're going to run into errors when you accidentally add a type to a record in certain cases (see below). A simple "This constructor function has no arguments" would've helped.

type SomeType
    = Nope | Yup Int

-- Throws a `I cannot find a `SomeType` variant:` error
{ test = SomeType }

-- Could silently fail (as it returns a function that takes an argument)
{ test = Yup }

Should some of these cases be disallowed?

SSCCE

• Elm: 0.19.1
• Browser: n/a
• Operating System: MacOs Monterey 12.7.6

Additional Details

I caveat this with the fact that the Elm compiler is a godsend and has caught and helped me fix so many silly mistakes! That's so important, I've dabbled with Purescript and the repl errors are so unhelpful.

[github-actions]

Thanks for reporting this! To set expectations:

• Issues are reviewed in batches, so it can take some time to get a response.
• Ask questions in a community forum. You will get an answer quicker that way!
• If you experience something similar, open a new issue. We like duplicates.

Finally, please be patient with the core team. They are trying their best with limited resources.