Skip to content

refactor: create L1, L2, common folders #30

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 5, 2025

Conversation

hiddentao
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@hiddentao hiddentao requested a review from makoto March 26, 2025 09:24
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Mar 26, 2025

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 14280619317

Details

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 67.991%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 14245158715: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 575
Relevant Lines: 825

💛 - Coveralls

@makoto
Copy link
Member

makoto commented Mar 27, 2025

Does rename "L1/L1EthRegistry" to "L1/EthRegistry" cause name collision with "L2/EthRegistry"? If not, then it should just be "L1/EthRegistry".

@makoto
Copy link
Member

makoto commented Mar 27, 2025

L1/L1EjectionController can just be called as L1/EjectionController

@makoto makoto requested a review from Arachnid March 27, 2025 18:15
@hiddentao
Copy link
Contributor Author

@makoto I think filenames should match the contract names to avoid any confusion, so will keep them as they are.

@hiddentao hiddentao merged commit c43733b into main Apr 5, 2025
1 check passed
@hiddentao hiddentao deleted the feature/bet-321-restructure-namechain-directory branch April 5, 2025 09:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants