Static allocated WifiClientSecureBearSSL #9261
Replies: 2 comments 8 replies
-
So where exactly are you seeing |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Well, i am having crashes concerning memory allocation in the wrapper WifiClientSecureBearSSL.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi everyone.
Having BearSSL free of dynamic memory allocations, wouldn't be sensible to also have a wrapper around it (such as WifiClientSecureBearSSL) that doesn't do dynamic allocations?
I understand the drawback of this setup, but sometimes, where memory budget is limited it would be pretty handy.
Let me know if that would be feasible and how hard it would be.
@earlephilhower I would certainly appreciate your comments regarding this topic
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions