You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
ensures that iwc WFs are usable on more public Galaxy instances
helps discover differences in installed tools on usegalaxy.* instances
We could start by testing on usegalaxy.org and usegalaxy.eu.
WFs that are known to run only on a specific server could have an accompanying blocklist in their tests (one option could be in the form of comment lines in the test.yml file).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
If we're doing this for PRs, it would be awesome to to extend it to "publishing" the latest revision of PR'd workflows to these servers for better interactive testing - e.g. create a "IWC Pull Request #210 - " workflow and keep it up to date and published as the PRs change. This is a response to a question from @bwlang at the GCC 2021 Americas workflow session.
"Meaningful IWC review involves downloading the .ga file, uploading to a local galaxy, then running locally. Any plans to reduce the barrier to review?"
Benefits:
We could start by testing on usegalaxy.org and usegalaxy.eu.
WFs that are known to run only on a specific server could have an accompanying blocklist in their tests (one option could be in the form of comment lines in the test.yml file).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: