Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement WMS GetMap and WFS GetFeature on layers #52

Open
gryckelynck opened this issue Mar 7, 2019 · 3 comments
Open

Implement WMS GetMap and WFS GetFeature on layers #52

gryckelynck opened this issue Mar 7, 2019 · 3 comments

Comments

@gryckelynck
Copy link
Collaborator

I run sdi-consistence-checker with this command line:

python checker.py --only-err --mode WMS --server https://www.geograndest.fr/geoserver/cd67/wms > results/wms-cd67.txt

I get in repport :

No ~/.sdichecker file found, skipping credentials definition.
#0
Layer: CD67_CANTONS_2015_CC48 OK

But in Geoserver layer doesn't work. I get this return:

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?><!DOCTYPE ServiceExceptionReport SYSTEM "https://www.geograndest.fr/geoserver/schemas/wms/1.1.1/WMS_exception_1_1_1.dtd"><ServiceExceptionReport version="1.1.1" >   <ServiceException>
      The requested Style can not be used with this layer.  The style specifies an attribute of NOM_DU_CAN and the layer is: cd67:CD67_CANTONS_2015_CC48
</ServiceException></ServiceExceptionReport>

What test is realised on WMS layer?

@MaelREBOUX
Copy link
Member

Is it the famous problem wich need a patch or update for GeoServer ? @pmauduit ?

@fvanderbiest
Copy link
Member

Hi @gryckelynck
There is currently no WMS GetMap or WFS GetFeature operation performed on the service so far. It would be a great addition though !

@fvanderbiest fvanderbiest changed the title [WMS Check] Report OK for layer but it doesn't work in Geoserver Implement WMS GetMap and WFS GetFeature on layers Dec 18, 2020
@fvanderbiest
Copy link
Member

Partially implemented by #51

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants