[copilot-agent-analysis] Daily Copilot Agent Analysis - 2026-03-28 #23338
Closed
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
This discussion has been marked as outdated by Copilot Agent PR Analysis. A newer discussion is available at Discussion #23438. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Summary
Analysis Period: Last 24 hours (2026-03-27T11:30Z → 2026-03-28T11:30Z)
Total PRs (
agent_prs_total): 15 | Merged (agent_prs_merged): 7 (47%) | Success Rate (merged/completed): 58% | Avg Duration: ~3h 25m (205 min)Performance Metrics (3-Day Trend)
📉 Trend: PR volume dropped significantly (50→9→8) and success rate is declining (88%→75%→40% for completed). Duration spiked on Mar 27 (+235%) and remains elevated.
Agent Task Texts
- [x] Add temporary ID resolution support to close_discussion.cjs for discussion_numberThe assign-milestone handler required agents to supply milestone_number, but the allowed confiAfter filterToolSchemaFields() shipped in #23279, there was no test exercising field-level enfTwo CLI tool versions released on 2026-03-27 with bug fixes and security patches.An empty missing-tool: or missing-data: block silently enabled issue creation (create-issue: trThanks for asking me to work on this. I will get started on it and keep this PR's description uThe DIFC proxy container was not receiving GITHUB_SERVER_URL, so on GHEC tenants it defaulted tThe .github/aw/ folder lacked a .gitignore, meaning contents of subdirectories like imports/ ccheckActorPermission was granting access when getRepository() failed or returned an empty stringWhen the AI model returns a transient server error after the agent has already emitted a noop saWhen update-discussion was configured with only allowed-labels (no title/body), the AI would caWhen update-discussion is configured with only labels: or allowed-labels:, the handler was uncoFixes the inconsistency where not mentioning missing-tool or missing-data left create-issue disaThanks for asking me to work on this. I will get started on it and keep this PR's description uGitHub.com added a new route (/actions/runs/{id}/agentic_workflow) that links directly to the aNotable PRs
Issues⚠️
Key Insights
References: §23684246172
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions