Persona Overview
- Agent: agentic-workflows
- Personas This Run: Information Worker, Product Manager, Backend Engineer
- Scenarios Tested: 4
- Average Quality Score: N/A
Key Findings
- Selected a non-technical-heavy slice first: Information Worker and Product Manager, plus Backend Engineer.
- Generated six scenarios and chose four representative cases for consolidated evaluation.
- The consolidated
agenticworkflows invocation did not return workflow-design guidance, so all tested scenarios were marked invocation_unavailable.
- Because no scenario response was produced, trigger/tool/security scoring is unavailable for this run.
- The main actionable gap is discoverability of a supported evaluation path for requesting design suggestions without editing workflows.
Top Patterns
- No response patterns were observable because the agent invocation failed before producing scenario-level output.
- No tool recommendations were returned, so comparative tool analysis was unavailable.
- Security-practice assessment was unavailable for all tested scenarios.
View Tested Personas and Scenarios
- Information Worker
- IW-1: Weekly summary of stale documentation files not updated in the last 90 days.
- IW-2: Triage newly merged PRs and draft internal release-note snippets.
- Product Manager
- PM-1: Weekly digest of completed features grouped by customer impact.
- PM-2: Flag PRs that change user-facing behavior without release-note updates.
- Backend Engineer
- BE-1: Review PRs for database migration safety risks.
- BE-2: Detect API contract changes and summarize breaking changes.
Tested subset this run: IW-1, PM-1, PM-2, BE-1.
View Invocation Failure Detail
Attempted a single consolidated agenticworkflows invocation with the four selected scenarios. The CLI returned:
Error [-32603]: calling "tools/call": failed to add workflows
This was treated as a standard partial-results outcome. Per instructions, the run continued and all scenario scores were marked unavailable instead of retrying repeatedly.
View Areas for Improvement (Top 3)
- Clarify the supported command/path for evaluating workflow ideas versus adding/updating repository workflow files.
- Add a documented example for multi-scenario research prompts in
.github/aw/create-agentic-workflow.md.
- Add troubleshooting guidance in
.github/aw/github-agentic-workflows.md for agenticworkflows invocation failures during evaluation-only use cases.
Recommendations (Top 3 only)
- Document a supported evaluation-only entry point in
.github/aw/github-agentic-workflows.md for asking the agent to propose workflow designs without mutating repository files.
- Add a concise multi-scenario example to
.github/aw/create-agentic-workflow.md so research runs can compare persona/task slices efficiently.
- Define expected failure handling and fallback behavior for unsupported
agenticworkflows commands so evaluation runs can distinguish product gaps from transient tool issues.
References:
Generated by 🎭 Agent Persona Explorer · gpt54 · 12.3 AIC · ⌖ 5.35 AIC · ⊞ 7.4K · ◷
Persona Overview
Key Findings
agenticworkflowsinvocation did not return workflow-design guidance, so all tested scenarios were markedinvocation_unavailable.Top Patterns
View Tested Personas and Scenarios
Tested subset this run: IW-1, PM-1, PM-2, BE-1.
View Invocation Failure Detail
Attempted a single consolidated
agenticworkflowsinvocation with the four selected scenarios. The CLI returned:Error [-32603]: calling "tools/call": failed to add workflowsThis was treated as a standard partial-results outcome. Per instructions, the run continued and all scenario scores were marked unavailable instead of retrying repeatedly.
View Areas for Improvement (Top 3)
.github/aw/create-agentic-workflow.md..github/aw/github-agentic-workflows.mdforagenticworkflowsinvocation failures during evaluation-only use cases.Recommendations (Top 3 only)
.github/aw/github-agentic-workflows.mdfor asking the agent to propose workflow designs without mutating repository files..github/aw/create-agentic-workflow.mdso research runs can compare persona/task slices efficiently.agenticworkflowscommands so evaluation runs can distinguish product gaps from transient tool issues.References: