You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
One other thing I see discrepancy with is missing NodeValueSetter in NodeTemplatePart. I get your reasoning - it also seems a bit faster to not have setter and call splitText in collecting parts instead of initial replacing with collected parts, but I wonder if nodePart.replacementNodes can be useful for processor implementors - it seems to be missing now.
// NodeTemplatePart
++ get replacementNodes() {++ return this.#parts++ }
One other thing I see discrepancy with is missing NodeValueSetter in NodeTemplatePart. I get your reasoning - it also seems a bit faster to not have setter and call
splitText
in collecting parts instead of initial replacing with collected parts, but I wonder ifnodePart.replacementNodes
can be useful for processor implementors - it seems to be missing now.Originally posted by @dy in #38 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: