@pratik-k-ev can you please elaborate your issue. Want to know more about the problem you are facing and how we can help to resolve it

The current error response format is

{
    "error": {
        "message": "..."
    }
}

I wanted to extend error response fields and standardize according to RFC 7807.

Fields in RFC 7807

{
  "type": "string",
  "title": "string",
  "status": "integer",
  "detail": "string",
  "instance": "string",
  "extensions": {
    "field_name": "value"
  }
}

Is there way to follow this, or extend current error response fields?

@Umang01-hash , Please assign this issue to me .....

Hey @pratik-k-ev, the error approach is proposed and I can see it has also become obsolete being replaced by RFC 9457.

We might extend support to send such errors through custom errors, however can you please let me know if this is still under proposal or has been accepted ?

Based on that, we can work on this feature for your usecase.

Is there a way to customise error payload fields..?