You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I honestly don't know why anyone would ever do this, but some providers think it's a good idea to serve tokens in an arbitrary format.
Currently it requires rewriting a considerable amount of code to support these custom responses. It would be nice if it would be easier to hook into the token parsing flow.
I understand that supporting implementations deviating from standards is an endless debate (khm...HTTP), so I understand if this never lands in the library, but I thought I'd start a discussion at least.
I'd be happy to work on this if the maintainers decide that they would allow to land something like this.
I've found a similar issue describing a very specific case here: #197
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@sagikazarmark I support this, see #484 for a specific, imho wide-spread use case.
I understand that supporting implementations deviating from standards is an endless debate (khm...HTTP), so I understand if this never lands in the library, but I thought I'd start a discussion at least.
I would also like to work on this. Unfortunately it seems that there is currently little feedback on issues from outside Google, maybe @bradfitz could help?
I honestly don't know why anyone would ever do this, but some providers think it's a good idea to serve tokens in an arbitrary format.
Currently it requires rewriting a considerable amount of code to support these custom responses. It would be nice if it would be easier to hook into the token parsing flow.
I understand that supporting implementations deviating from standards is an endless debate (khm...HTTP), so I understand if this never lands in the library, but I thought I'd start a discussion at least.
I'd be happy to work on this if the maintainers decide that they would allow to land something like this.
I've found a similar issue describing a very specific case here: #197
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: