|
| 1 | +# Controls |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +Gruntwork Account Factory employs a defense-in-depth approach to secure workflows across both GitHub and GitLab platforms. This document outlines the controls Pipelines uses to ensure that only infrastructure written in code and approved by a reviewer can be deployed to your AWS accounts. |
| 4 | + |
| 5 | +## Least privilege principle |
| 6 | + |
| 7 | +Pipelines adheres to the principle of least privilege, granting only the necessary permissions for infrastructure actions. |
| 8 | + |
| 9 | +By default, the only repository/group required to interact with infrastructure using Pipelines in Gruntwork Account Factory is the `infrastructure-live-root` repository/group. This contains infrastructure code for `management`, `logs`, `security`, and `shared` accounts. Access should be limited to a small, trusted group responsible for defining critical infrastructure, similar to the role of the `root` user in Unix systems. |
| 10 | + |
| 11 | +## Platform-Specific Access Controls |
| 12 | + |
| 13 | +import Tabs from "@theme/Tabs" |
| 14 | +import TabItem from "@theme/TabItem" |
| 15 | + |
| 16 | +<Tabs groupId="platform"> |
| 17 | +<TabItem value="github" label="GitHub" default> |
| 18 | + |
| 19 | +- The AWS IAM role assumed via OIDC when pull requests are opened or updated has a trust policy that restricts access to the repository itself and provides read-only permissions |
| 20 | +- The AWS IAM role assumed via OIDC when pull requests are merged into the `main` branch has a trust policy limiting access to the repository's `main` branch and granting write permissions |
| 21 | +- Branch protection rules can be configured to require reviews and status checks |
| 22 | +- GitHub App or machine user authentication options available |
| 23 | + |
| 24 | +</TabItem> |
| 25 | +<TabItem value="gitlab" label="GitLab"> |
| 26 | + |
| 27 | +- The AWS IAM role assumed via OIDC when merge requests are opened or updated has a trust policy that restricts access to the group itself and provides read-only permissions |
| 28 | +- The AWS IAM role assumed via OIDC when merge requests are merged into the `main` branch has a trust policy limiting access to the group's `main` branch and granting write permissions |
| 29 | +- Protected branches can be configured to require approvals and pipeline success |
| 30 | +- Machine user authentication required with group-level access configuration |
| 31 | + |
| 32 | +</TabItem> |
| 33 | +</Tabs> |
| 34 | + |
| 35 | +## Infrastructure access control |
| 36 | + |
| 37 | +An optional `infrastructure-live-access-control` repository/group can manage access control for infrastructure provisioned in AWS accounts. Using this is a best practice for centralized and auditable access management. |
| 38 | + |
| 39 | +- Access to the `main` branch should be restricted to a small, trusted group managing infrastructure access |
| 40 | +- The same least privilege principles apply: roles assumed for pull/merge requests have read-only permissions, while roles for merged changes have write permissions |
| 41 | + |
| 42 | +Unlike the infrastructure-live-root repository, this repository focuses on managing access control rather than defining infrastructure. You might grant write access to a broader group for managing access while maintaining tight control over the main branch. Encourage collaboration between platform teams and application engineers to review and refine access control continuously. |
| 43 | + |
| 44 | +## Token Strategy |
| 45 | + |
| 46 | +<Tabs groupId="platform"> |
| 47 | +<TabItem value="github" label="GitHub" default> |
| 48 | + |
| 49 | +### GitHub App Installation Strategy (Recommended) |
| 50 | + |
| 51 | +No tokens are required when using the GitHub App. |
| 52 | + |
| 53 | +### Machine Users Installation Strategy |
| 54 | + |
| 55 | +Requires the following tokens be created: |
| 56 | + |
| 57 | +- `PIPELINES_READ_TOKEN`: Classic PAT with read access to required repositories |
| 58 | +- `INFRA_ROOT_WRITE_TOKEN`: Fine-grained PAT with read/write access to infrastructure repositories |
| 59 | +- `ORG_REPO_ADMIN_TOKEN`: Fine-grained PAT with admin access for repository management |
| 60 | + |
| 61 | +See [Setup via Machine Users](/2.0/docs/pipelines/installation/viamachineusers.md) for more details. |
| 62 | + |
| 63 | +</TabItem> |
| 64 | +<TabItem value="gitlab" label="GitLab"> |
| 65 | + |
| 66 | +Requires the following tokens be created: |
| 67 | + |
| 68 | +- `PIPELINES_GITLAB_TOKEN`: A GitLab access token with `api` scope |
| 69 | +- `PIPELINES_GITLAB_READ_TOKEN`: A GitLab access token with `read_repository` scope |
| 70 | + |
| 71 | +See [Setup via Machine Users](/2.0/docs/pipelines/installation/viamachineusers) for more details. |
| 72 | + |
| 73 | +Pipelines will also require access to Gruntwork's GitHub repositories, however those tokens are generated at runtime via the Gruntwork Management Portal. |
| 74 | + |
| 75 | +</TabItem> |
| 76 | +</Tabs> |
| 77 | + |
| 78 | +## AWS credentials |
| 79 | + |
| 80 | +Pipelines requires IAM roles configured with trust policies to use OpenID Connect (OIDC) with your CI/CD platform. This eliminates the need for long-lived AWS credentials stored as secrets. |
| 81 | + |
| 82 | +### OpenID Connect Configuration |
| 83 | + |
| 84 | +Pipelines provisions an OpenID Connect identity provider in AWS IAM for each account, setting GitHub/GitLab as the provider and restricting the audience to AWS STS and your GitHub/GitLab organization. The Pipelines IAM role's trust policy ensures: |
| 85 | + |
| 86 | +- Only a single repository in your GitHub/GitLab organization can assume the role for plans. |
| 87 | +- Only a single branch can assume the role for applies/destroys. |
| 88 | + |
| 89 | +For more details, see the [official AWS documentation](https://docs.aws.amazon.com/IAM/latest/UserGuide/id_roles_providers_create_oidc.html). Below is an example of a trust policy used by Pipelines. |
| 90 | + |
| 91 | +<Tabs groupId="platform"> |
| 92 | +<TabItem value="github" label="GitHub" default> |
| 93 | + |
| 94 | +```json |
| 95 | +{ |
| 96 | + "Version": "2012-10-17", |
| 97 | + "Statement": [ |
| 98 | + { |
| 99 | + "Sid": "", |
| 100 | + "Effect": "Allow", |
| 101 | + "Principal": { |
| 102 | + "Federated": "arn:aws:iam::0123456789012:oidc-provider/token.actions.githubusercontent.com" |
| 103 | + }, |
| 104 | + "Action": "sts:AssumeRoleWithWebIdentity", |
| 105 | + "Condition": { |
| 106 | + "StringLike": { |
| 107 | + "token.actions.githubusercontent.com:sub": "repo:acme/infrastructure-live-root:ref:*" |
| 108 | + } |
| 109 | + } |
| 110 | + } |
| 111 | + ] |
| 112 | +} |
| 113 | +``` |
| 114 | + |
| 115 | +</TabItem> |
| 116 | + |
| 117 | +<TabItem value="gitlab" label="GitLab"> |
| 118 | + |
| 119 | +```json |
| 120 | +{ |
| 121 | + "Version": "2012-10-17", |
| 122 | + "Statement": [ |
| 123 | + { |
| 124 | + "Sid": "", |
| 125 | + "Effect": "Allow", |
| 126 | + "Principal": { |
| 127 | + "Federated": "arn:aws:iam::0123456789012:oidc-provider/gitlab.com" |
| 128 | + }, |
| 129 | + "Action": "sts:AssumeRoleWithWebIdentity", |
| 130 | + "Condition": { |
| 131 | + "StringLike": { |
| 132 | + "gitlab.com:sub": "project_path:acme/projectprefix*:*" |
| 133 | + } |
| 134 | + } |
| 135 | + } |
| 136 | + ] |
| 137 | +} |
| 138 | + |
| 139 | + |
| 140 | +``` |
| 141 | + |
| 142 | +</TabItem> |
| 143 | +</Tabs> |
| 144 | + |
| 145 | +Refer to [Configuring OpenId Connect in Amazon Web Services](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/deployment/security-hardening-your-deployments/configuring-openid-connect-in-amazon-web-services) for additional details. |
| 146 | + |
| 147 | +### Roles provisioned by DevOps Foundations |
| 148 | + |
| 149 | +Pipelines automatically provisions specific roles in AWS accounts to support required infrastructure operations. These roles follow the naming pattern `<repository-allowed-to-use-the-role>-pipelines-<permissions>`. |
| 150 | + |
| 151 | +For example: |
| 152 | + |
| 153 | +- The `root-pipelines-plan` role is used by Pipelines to plan changes in the `infrastructure-live-root` repository. |
| 154 | + |
| 155 | +These roles are designed to operate in a single repository and include a trust policy that only permits GitHub Actions workflows triggered by that repository to assume the role. Each role is provisioned in pairs: |
| 156 | + |
| 157 | +- `plan` roles, with read-only permissions, are used to execute Terragrunt plans for open pull requests. |
| 158 | +- `apply` roles, with read/write permissions, are used to apply or destroy infrastructure changes for merged pull requests or direct pushes to the deploy branch (commonly `main`). |
| 159 | + |
| 160 | +This separation ensures that controls like [branch protection](https://docs.github.com/en/repositories/configuring-branches-and-merges-in-your-repository/managing-protected-branches/about-protected-branches) and [CODEOWNERS files](https://docs.github.com/en/repositories/managing-your-repositorys-settings-and-features/customizing-your-repository/about-code-owners) can effectively govern infrastructure changes. |
| 161 | + |
| 162 | +#### `root-pipelines-plan` |
| 163 | + |
| 164 | +A read-only plan role for the `infrastructure-live-root` repository. |
| 165 | + |
| 166 | +- This role is one of the first created when setting up DevOps Foundations. It is provisioned manually by the customer during the platform setup process. |
| 167 | +- It exists in all accounts and handles tasks necessary for setting up AWS accounts. |
| 168 | +- These roles are highly permissive among read-only roles as they manage foundational AWS account setups. |
| 169 | + |
| 170 | +#### `root-pipelines-apply` |
| 171 | + |
| 172 | +A read/write apply role for the `infrastructure-live-root` repository. |
| 173 | + |
| 174 | +- Like the plan role, this is one of the initial roles created during setup. |
| 175 | +- It is broadly permissive to support foundational account setups and bootstrapping. |
| 176 | + |
| 177 | +#### `access-control-pipelines-plan` |
| 178 | + |
| 179 | +A read-only plan role for the `infrastructure-live-access-control` repository. |
| 180 | + |
| 181 | +- These roles are provisioned for new accounts but are not included in core accounts such as `management`, `logs`, `security`, or `shared`. |
| 182 | +- They manage IAM roles and policies for vended accounts, facilitating infrastructure access control. |
| 183 | + |
| 184 | +#### `access-control-pipelines-apply` |
| 185 | + |
| 186 | +A read/write apply role for the `infrastructure-live-access-control` repository. |
| 187 | + |
| 188 | +- Similar to the plan role, these roles are provisioned for vended accounts but excluded from core accounts. |
| 189 | +- They have permissions to manage IAM roles and policies for the accounts where they are provisioned. |
| 190 | + |
| 191 | +#### `delegated-pipelines-plan` |
| 192 | + |
| 193 | +A read-only plan role for delegated repositories, used by Pipelines Enterprise customers. |
| 194 | + |
| 195 | +- These roles are pre-configured to have minimal permissions, primarily for managing OpenTofu/Terraform state. |
| 196 | +- A pull request will be opened in `infrastructure-live-access-control` during provisioning include documentation for adding additional permissions if necessary. |
| 197 | +- Users should ensure that only the necessary _read-only_ permissions are granted for the specific delegated repository. |
| 198 | + |
| 199 | +:::note |
| 200 | + |
| 201 | +These roles have almost no permissions by default. They are pre-configured by default to only have access to OpenTofu/Terraform state, and the pull requests that are opened to provision them include documentation on how to add additional permissions as appropriate. |
| 202 | + |
| 203 | +It is up to the user provisioning these roles to ensure that this role has only the necessary _read-only_ permissions required to manage infrastructure changes relevant to the delegated repository. |
| 204 | + |
| 205 | +::: |
| 206 | + |
| 207 | +#### `delegated-pipelines-apply` |
| 208 | + |
| 209 | +A read/write apply role for delegated repositories. |
| 210 | + |
| 211 | +- Similar to the plan role, these roles are pre-configured with minimal permissions and are intended for managing OpenTofu/Terraform state. |
| 212 | +- A pull request will be opened in `infrastructure-live-access-control` during provisioning include documentation for adding additional permissions if necessary. |
| 213 | +- Users must ensure that the role has only the necessary _read/write_ permissions required for the delegated repository. |
| 214 | + |
| 215 | +:::note |
| 216 | +The `delegated-pipelines-plan` and `delegated-pipelines-apply` roles are automatically provisioned for new delegated accounts. Enterprise customers will see pull requests created in the `infrastructure-live-access-control` repository to vend these roles with proper configurations. |
| 217 | +::: |
| 218 | + |
| 219 | +## Trust boundaries |
| 220 | + |
| 221 | +A critical aspect of Pipelines' architecture is understanding its trust model. Since Pipelines runs within a CI/CD system, it has privileged access to your infrastructure resources (e.g. AWS accounts, VPCs, EC2 instances, etc.). |
| 222 | + |
| 223 | +Anyone with the ability to edit code in the `main` branch of your repositories inherently has the authority to make corresponding changes in your infrastructure resources. For this reason, it is important to follow the [Repository Access](/2.0/docs/pipelines/installation/viamachineusers#repository-access) guidelines to ensure appropriate access control. |
| 224 | + |
| 225 | +:::tip |
| 226 | + |
| 227 | +Each AWS IAM role provisioned through setup of [Gruntwork Account Factory](https://docs.gruntwork.io/account-factory/overview) is configured to trust a single repository (and, for apply roles, a single branch). If a role's permissions become overly broad, consider creating a new role with more granular permissions tailored to the specific use case. Use the `infrastructure-live-access-control` repository to define and manage these roles. |
| 228 | + |
| 229 | +::: |
0 commit comments