You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: docs/methodology/REGISTRY.md
+2-2Lines changed: 2 additions & 2 deletions
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -1021,7 +1021,7 @@ The paper text states a stricter bound (T_min + 1) but the R code by the co-auth
1021
1021
-[x] Anticipation parameter support
1022
1022
-[x] Never-treated encoding (0 and inf)
1023
1023
-[x] Survey design support (Phase 3): Q-weights compose multiplicatively with survey weights; TSL vcov on composed weights; survey design columns propagated through sub-experiments
1024
-
-**Note:** Survey weights compose multiplicatively with Q-weights for StackedDiD
1024
+
-**Note:** Survey weights compose multiplicatively with Q-weights for StackedDiD; `weight_type="fweight"` is rejected because Q-weight composition produces non-integer composed weights that break frequency-weight semantics
1025
1025
1026
1026
---
1027
1027
@@ -1576,7 +1576,7 @@ Weights depend on group sizes and variance in treatment timing.
1576
1576
-[ ] TWFE coefficient ≈ weighted sum of 2×2 estimates
1577
1577
-[ ] Visualization shows weight vs. estimate by comparison type
1578
1578
-[x] Survey design support (Phase 3): weighted cell means, weighted within-transform, weighted group shares
1579
-
-**Note:** Bacon decomposition with survey weights is diagnostic; exact-sum guarantee is approximate
1579
+
-**Note:** Bacon decomposition with survey weights is diagnostic; exact-sum guarantee is approximate; `weights="exact"` requires within-unit-constant survey columns (approximate path accepts time-varying weights)
0 commit comments