-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 397
Description
Hello,
Thank you for developing the Supplementary Reads Diagram
feature. It is great! :)
Could you help me understand how the Read Order
was determined in IGV (2.19.1), please?
Here is a read (approximately 12,870 nt in length) with a primary alignment and a supplementary alignment in the SAM file:
m84031_230819_191531_s3/188744736/ccs 2064 chr13 32216996 60 1005=1X411=1X264=1D414=1I394=10379S ... ... SA:Z:chr13,32335803,-,6402S505=5I2610=1X1949=1X1397=,60,2;
m84031_230819_191531_s3/188744736/ccs 16 chr13 32335803 60 6402S505=5I2610=1X1949=1X1397= ... ... SA:Z:chr13,32216996,-,1005=1X411=1X264=1D414=1I394=10379S,60,2;
The same read was shown in the Supplementary Reads Diagram` as below:
I can understand the alignment order, which corresponds to what is shown in the SAM file, but I don't understand why the two segments in the read order were flipped.
How should I interpret this read order? Does it imply that the individual who carries this sequence has flipped segments compared with the reference genome? If the answer to this question is yes, does it imply a new type of variation outside inversion and translocation?
If I just looked at the SAM outputs, I would incline to think this read carries a deletion, as the distance between breakpoints on the same strand (approx 116,317 nt) is much larger than the read length itself.
Many thanks,
Min