Skip to content

Read order in supplementary reads diagram #1666

@minw2828

Description

@minw2828

Hello,

Thank you for developing the Supplementary Reads Diagram feature. It is great! :)

Could you help me understand how the Read Order was determined in IGV (2.19.1), please?

Here is a read (approximately 12,870 nt in length) with a primary alignment and a supplementary alignment in the SAM file:

m84031_230819_191531_s3/188744736/ccs	2064	chr13	32216996	60	1005=1X411=1X264=1D414=1I394=10379S	...	...	SA:Z:chr13,32335803,-,6402S505=5I2610=1X1949=1X1397=,60,2;
m84031_230819_191531_s3/188744736/ccs	16	chr13	32335803	60	6402S505=5I2610=1X1949=1X1397=	...	...	SA:Z:chr13,32216996,-,1005=1X411=1X264=1D414=1I394=10379S,60,2;

The same read was shown in the Supplementary Reads Diagram` as below:
Image
Image

I can understand the alignment order, which corresponds to what is shown in the SAM file, but I don't understand why the two segments in the read order were flipped.

How should I interpret this read order? Does it imply that the individual who carries this sequence has flipped segments compared with the reference genome? If the answer to this question is yes, does it imply a new type of variation outside inversion and translocation?

If I just looked at the SAM outputs, I would incline to think this read carries a deletion, as the distance between breakpoints on the same strand (approx 116,317 nt) is much larger than the read length itself.

Many thanks,
Min

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions