This module has an incomingStreamTimeout option that closes an incoming stream if data isn't received after that many ms.
It uses an abortable-source which has been shown to be a performance bottleneck.
Instead maybe we cold rely on the underlying connection's timeout instead?
This module has an
incomingStreamTimeoutoption that closes an incoming stream if data isn't received after that many ms.It uses an
abortable-sourcewhich has been shown to be a performance bottleneck.Instead maybe we cold rely on the underlying connection's timeout instead?