Commercial-grade compliance posture

[jessephus]

Problem

Commercial-grade compliance posture

Why this was deferred from the MVP

The MVP is for personal use, so the repo should not block on the heavier compliance work required for a commercial health-data product.

Proposed future approach

Treat privacy engineering, legal review, and policy documentation as a dedicated workstream before any paid or multi-user rollout.

Security and privacy considerations

• Commercial use likely requires stronger vendor reviews, deletion guarantees, and documented operational controls.
• Data processing agreements and regulatory counsel become much more important once other users are involved.

Acceptance criteria

• The product has documented privacy, retention, deletion, and incident-response policies.
• Core infrastructure choices are reviewed against the relevant legal and regulatory posture.

Open questions

• Which jurisdictions matter first if the product expands beyond personal use?
• Which providers can support the necessary contractual posture?

Created automatically from the MVP deferred-feature spec dataset.