- Date/time
- Applicant name
- Reviewer(s)
Code meets the expected output. Code is readable (follows indentation, casing, etc.). Did they demonstrate a good grasp of the fundamental concepts?
- No: No progress made - 0pts
- Needs improvement: Correct idea but not working and/or not complete - 1-3pts
- Yes: Correct, complete, and runs without errors - 4pts
Reviewer comments:
score:
Familiarity with error messages. Reacting in a proactive way to solve errors.
- No: does not read/understand error messages - 0pts
- Needs improvement: some familiarity, but might need some assistance - 0.5pts
- Yes: reads/understands error messages and incorporates feedback - 1pt
Reviewer comments:
score:
Familiarity with terminal and vscode. Able to navigate development environment.
- No: struggles with tools - 0pts
- Needs Improvement: some familiarity, but might need some assistance - 0.5pts
- Yes: navigates smoothly and efficiently - 1pt
Reviewer comments:
score:
Listening to advice in a professional manner. Responding to advice with successful results. Did they maintain a positive attitude, especially when encountering roadblocks or when given feedback?
- No: Not listening/responding. Negative attitude - 0pts
- Needs improvement: Listening and/or responding to coaching, but not utilizing feedback - 0.5pts
- Yes: Responds well to coaching - 1pt
Reviewer comments:
score:
Demonstrate an ability to use natural, human language that describes their intentions, goals, and methodologies. Ability to phrase questions in a general way whenever possible. Could they provide a clear explanation of their solution?
- No: Not able (or willing) to communicate - 0pts
- Needs improvement: Asks questions, but might require additional coaching - 0.5pts
- Yes: Communicates well - 1pt
Reviewer comments:
score:
- Solution (/4):
- Debugging (/2):
- Behavior (/2):