Skip to content

[survey] Need your feedback on Karmada Concept <Host Cluster> #137

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
RainbowMango opened this issue May 20, 2025 · 2 comments
Open

[survey] Need your feedback on Karmada Concept <Host Cluster> #137

RainbowMango opened this issue May 20, 2025 · 2 comments

Comments

@RainbowMango
Copy link
Member

RainbowMango commented May 20, 2025

Background
The Kubernetes SIG-Multicluster is proposing a standardized definition for the central cluster (currently termed "Host Cluster" in Karmada) to unify terminology across multi-cluster management projects like Karmada, OCM, clusternet, kubefleet, MCO, KubeAdmiral and so on. This initiative aims to improve cross-project interoperability and reduce ecosystem fragmentation.

To evaluate the impact of adopting this standard and gather user feedback, ​​we are launching a community survey​​. Your input will directly influence Karmada's alignment with SIG-MC's proposal and guide our compatibility strategies.

Survey Objective

  • Assess adoption impact (e.g., API compatibility, product interfaces).
  • Identify user preferences for terminology (Host Cluster vs. Hub Cluster, etc.).

Key Questions

  • Are you using Karmada in production?
  • Which term do you prefer for the cluster where Karmada is installed? (currently termed Host Cluster in Karmada)
    • Option: Host Cluster
    • Option: Hub Cluster
    • Option: Management Cluster
    • Option: Command Cluster
    • Option: Meta Cluster
    • Other suggestions: propose another one
  • Which term do you prefer for the cluster which is managed by Karmada? (currently termed Member Cluster in Karmada)
    • Option: Member Cluster
    • Option: Spoke Cluster
    • Option: Workload Cluster
    • Option: Managed Cluster
    • Other suggestions: propose another one
  • Would renaming "Host Cluster" affect your usage?
    • Option: No impact
    • Option: Minor adjustment(eg., documentation updates)
    • Option: Major changes (e.g., API/CLI/UI compatibility issues)

How to respond?
Please leave your comment on this issue or fill in the online form before June 10, 2025.

@RainbowMango RainbowMango changed the title [survey] Feedback Collection on SIG-Multicluster's Standard Definition for "Host Cluster" in Karmada [survey] Need your feedback on Karmada Concept <Host Cluster> May 20, 2025
@RainbowMango
Copy link
Member Author

cc @karmada-io/karmada-adopter-group

@likku123
Copy link

I prefer using the terms Host cluster and member cluster. Which is very convinient to me. I see hub and spoke model specifying in Open cluster Management which one might get confused when exploring or using both the tools.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants