Replies: 1 comment
-
| 
         To 1: So for now I can do everything I want, but more flexibility, especially regarding the generated files, would be nice.  | 
  
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
                  
                    0 replies
                  
                
            
  
    Sign up for free
    to join this conversation on GitHub.
    Already have an account?
    Sign in to comment
  
        
    
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I want to generate more than just
XyzResolverinterfaces.Like
XyzResolverImplandXyzServiceinterfaces.Describe the solution you'd like
classNamewithout the suffix.@SchemaMappingannotation.Current workarounds
I can split the current
classNameby using?keep_before("Resolver"). That works but bloats the template, since that's done in numerous places.But generating the
@SchemaMappingis currently impossible I think, as I have no way of knowing the type.Currently I just have them in one file. That's not so bad and is not a priority, but it would be very nice to expand this even further in the future, so that eg. the service interfaces lie in their own package. A generic mechanism would be awesome so you could generate variable amounts of files into variable directories without having them hard coded as
modelandapi.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions