|
| 1 | +package transactions; |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test; |
| 4 | + |
| 5 | +import java.util.List; |
| 6 | + |
| 7 | +import static org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertEquals; |
| 8 | +import static org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertFalse; |
| 9 | +import static org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertTrue; |
| 10 | + |
| 11 | +class InMemoryValidationServiceTest { |
| 12 | + |
| 13 | + private final ValidationService service = ValidationService.getInstance(); |
| 14 | + |
| 15 | + private Transaction createTransaction(long id, long orderId, long amount, TransactionType type) { |
| 16 | + return new Transaction(id, orderId, amount, type); |
| 17 | + } |
| 18 | + |
| 19 | + @Test |
| 20 | + void testNullTransactions() { |
| 21 | + ValidationResult result = service.validate(null, 100); |
| 22 | + assertTrue(result.getTransactions().isEmpty(), "Result should be empty for null transactions"); |
| 23 | + } |
| 24 | + |
| 25 | + @Test |
| 26 | + void testEmptyTransactions() { |
| 27 | + ValidationResult result = service.validate(List.of(), 100); |
| 28 | + assertTrue(result.getTransactions().isEmpty(), "Result should be empty for empty transactions"); |
| 29 | + } |
| 30 | + |
| 31 | + @Test |
| 32 | + void testNegativeInitialBalance() { |
| 33 | + List<Transaction> transactions = List.of(createTransaction(1, 1, 50, TransactionType.BET)); |
| 34 | + ValidationResult result = service.validate(transactions, -10); |
| 35 | + assertTrue(result.getTransactions().isEmpty(), "Result should be empty for negative initial balance"); |
| 36 | + } |
| 37 | + |
| 38 | + @Test |
| 39 | + void testValidBetTransaction() { |
| 40 | + List<Transaction> transactions = List.of(createTransaction(1, 1, 50, TransactionType.BET)); |
| 41 | + ValidationResult result = service.validate(transactions, 100); |
| 42 | + List<TransactionStatus> statuses = result.getTransactions(); |
| 43 | + assertEquals(1, statuses.size(), "There should be one transaction status"); |
| 44 | + assertTrue(statuses.getFirst().status(), "BET transaction should be valid when balance is sufficient"); |
| 45 | + } |
| 46 | + |
| 47 | + @Test |
| 48 | + void testInvalidBetTransactionDueToInsufficientBalance() { |
| 49 | + List<Transaction> transactions = List.of(createTransaction(1, 1, 150, TransactionType.BET)); |
| 50 | + ValidationResult result = service.validate(transactions, 100); |
| 51 | + List<TransactionStatus> statuses = result.getTransactions(); |
| 52 | + assertEquals(1, statuses.size(), "There should be one transaction status"); |
| 53 | + assertFalse(statuses.getFirst().status(), "BET transaction should be invalid due to insufficient balance"); |
| 54 | + } |
| 55 | + |
| 56 | + @Test |
| 57 | + void testWinTransactionIncreasesBalance() { |
| 58 | + // WIN-транзакция увеличивает баланс, позволяя последующей BET-транзакции пройти валидацию |
| 59 | + Transaction win = createTransaction(1, 1, 50, TransactionType.WIN); |
| 60 | + Transaction bet = createTransaction(2, 2, 120, TransactionType.BET); |
| 61 | + List<Transaction> transactions = List.of(win, bet); |
| 62 | + ValidationResult result = service.validate(transactions, 100); |
| 63 | + List<TransactionStatus> statuses = result.getTransactions(); |
| 64 | + assertEquals(2, statuses.size(), "There should be two transaction statuses"); |
| 65 | + assertTrue(statuses.get(0).status(), "WIN transaction should be valid"); |
| 66 | + assertTrue(statuses.get(1).status(), "BET transaction should be valid after balance increase"); |
| 67 | + } |
| 68 | + |
| 69 | + @Test |
| 70 | + void testDuplicateTransactionId() { |
| 71 | + Transaction t1 = createTransaction(1, 1, 50, TransactionType.WIN); |
| 72 | + // Повторное использование id 1 должно пометить вторую транзакцию как невалидную |
| 73 | + Transaction t2 = createTransaction(1, 2, 30, TransactionType.BET); |
| 74 | + List<Transaction> transactions = List.of(t1, t2); |
| 75 | + ValidationResult result = service.validate(transactions, 100); |
| 76 | + List<TransactionStatus> statuses = result.getTransactions(); |
| 77 | + assertEquals(2, statuses.size(), "There should be two transaction statuses"); |
| 78 | + assertTrue(statuses.get(0).status(), "First transaction should be valid"); |
| 79 | + assertFalse(statuses.get(1).status(), "Duplicate transaction id should mark second transaction invalid"); |
| 80 | + } |
| 81 | + |
| 82 | + @Test |
| 83 | + void testFailedOrderIdAffectsSubsequentTransactions() { |
| 84 | + // Первая транзакция не проходит валидацию из-за недостатка средств |
| 85 | + Transaction bet1 = createTransaction(1, 10, 150, TransactionType.BET); |
| 86 | + // Вторая транзакция с тем же orderId должна быть невалидной вне зависимости от типа |
| 87 | + Transaction win1 = createTransaction(2, 10, 100, TransactionType.WIN); |
| 88 | + List<Transaction> transactions = List.of(bet1, win1); |
| 89 | + ValidationResult result = service.validate(transactions, 100); |
| 90 | + List<TransactionStatus> statuses = result.getTransactions(); |
| 91 | + assertEquals(2, statuses.size(), "There should be two transaction statuses"); |
| 92 | + assertFalse(statuses.get(0).status(), "First transaction should be invalid due to insufficient funds"); |
| 93 | + assertFalse(statuses.get(1).status(), "Transaction with same order id as failed transaction should be invalid"); |
| 94 | + } |
| 95 | + |
| 96 | + @Test |
| 97 | + void testTransactionsProcessedInOrder() { |
| 98 | + // Транзакции заданы не по порядку: сначала BET (id 2), затем WIN (id 1). |
| 99 | + // После сортировки они должны обрабатываться в правильном порядке. |
| 100 | + Transaction bet = createTransaction(2, 1, 50, TransactionType.BET); |
| 101 | + Transaction win = createTransaction(1, 2, 100, TransactionType.WIN); |
| 102 | + List<Transaction> transactions = List.of(bet, win); |
| 103 | + // Начальный баланс 50, после обработки WIN становится 150, затем BET списывает 50 -> итог 100 |
| 104 | + ValidationResult result = service.validate(transactions, 50); |
| 105 | + List<TransactionStatus> statuses = result.getTransactions(); |
| 106 | + assertEquals(2, statuses.size(), "There should be two transaction statuses"); |
| 107 | + assertTrue(statuses.get(0).status(), "First processed transaction should be valid"); |
| 108 | + assertTrue(statuses.get(1).status(), "Second processed transaction should be valid"); |
| 109 | + } |
| 110 | +} |
0 commit comments