Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Expose volumes and volumeMounts in the add-on configuration #2326

Open
lewayne-aws opened this issue Jan 30, 2025 · 2 comments
Open

Expose volumes and volumeMounts in the add-on configuration #2326

lewayne-aws opened this issue Jan 30, 2025 · 2 comments
Assignees

Comments

@lewayne-aws
Copy link

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Currently, the helm chart supports adding volumes and volume mounts at deploy time

#1436: helm: Expose volumes and volumeMounts for the ebs-csi-controller deployment

This is not currently mirrored in the EKS addon configuration schema

Describe the solution you'd like in detail
Ideally, values supported by helm should be mirrored in the addon configuration

Describe alternatives you've considered
Currently, anyone needing to use these values would have to directly use the Helm chart, or patch resources after deployment via addons. Ideally, this should not be necessary

Additional context
There are similar requests for both amazon-vpc-cni-k8s and aws-efs-csi-driver with the same motivations.

@ElijahQuinones
Copy link
Member

Hi @lewayne-aws

The team has met about this issue (among other values that are in the chart and not the add-on) and this is should actually make it into the 1.40 release. Will keep this issue open until then. Thank you !

@ElijahQuinones ElijahQuinones self-assigned this Jan 31, 2025
@abroodav
Copy link

abroodav commented Feb 7, 2025

Hello team,
+1 on the request to mirror the helm chart parameters to the EKS add-on.

Another variance we found was with the optional parameter "storageclasses" which is not present in the EKS add-on.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants