Skip to content

Commit a6812c8

Browse files
committed
Rustfmt modified fns
1 parent 2f6b197 commit a6812c8

File tree

1 file changed

+123
-71
lines changed

1 file changed

+123
-71
lines changed

lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs

Lines changed: 123 additions & 71 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -9827,30 +9827,35 @@ This indicates a bug inside LDK. Please report this error at https://github.com/
98279827
}
98289828

98299829
/// TODO(dual_funding): Allow contributions, pass intended amount and inputs
9830-
#[rustfmt::skip]
98319830
fn do_accept_inbound_channel(
9832-
&self, temporary_channel_id: &ChannelId, counterparty_node_id: &PublicKey, accept_0conf: bool,
9833-
user_channel_id: u128, config_overrides: Option<ChannelConfigOverrides>
9831+
&self, temporary_channel_id: &ChannelId, counterparty_node_id: &PublicKey,
9832+
accept_0conf: bool, user_channel_id: u128,
9833+
config_overrides: Option<ChannelConfigOverrides>,
98349834
) -> Result<(), APIError> {
9835-
98369835
let mut config = self.config.read().unwrap().clone();
98379836

98389837
// Apply configuration overrides.
98399838
if let Some(overrides) = config_overrides {
98409839
config.apply(&overrides);
98419840
};
98429841

9843-
let logger = WithContext::from(&self.logger, Some(*counterparty_node_id), Some(*temporary_channel_id), None);
9842+
let logger = WithContext::from(
9843+
&self.logger,
9844+
Some(*counterparty_node_id),
9845+
Some(*temporary_channel_id),
9846+
None,
9847+
);
98449848
let _persistence_guard = PersistenceNotifierGuard::notify_on_drop(self);
98459849

98469850
let peers_without_funded_channels =
9847-
self.peers_without_funded_channels(|peer| { peer.total_channel_count() > 0 });
9851+
self.peers_without_funded_channels(|peer| peer.total_channel_count() > 0);
98489852
let per_peer_state = self.per_peer_state.read().unwrap();
9849-
let peer_state_mutex = per_peer_state.get(counterparty_node_id)
9850-
.ok_or_else(|| {
9853+
let peer_state_mutex = per_peer_state.get(counterparty_node_id).ok_or_else(|| {
98519854
log_error!(logger, "Can't find peer matching the passed counterparty node_id");
98529855

9853-
let err_str = format!("Can't find a peer matching the passed counterparty node_id {counterparty_node_id}");
9856+
let err_str = format!(
9857+
"Can't find a peer matching the passed counterparty node_id {counterparty_node_id}"
9858+
);
98549859
APIError::ChannelUnavailable { err: err_str }
98559860
})?;
98569861
let mut peer_state_lock = peer_state_mutex.lock().unwrap();
@@ -9865,50 +9870,71 @@ This indicates a bug inside LDK. Please report this error at https://github.com/
98659870
Some(unaccepted_channel) => {
98669871
let best_block_height = self.best_block.read().unwrap().height;
98679872
match unaccepted_channel.open_channel_msg {
9868-
OpenChannelMessage::V1(open_channel_msg) => {
9869-
InboundV1Channel::new(
9870-
&self.fee_estimator, &self.entropy_source, &self.signer_provider, *counterparty_node_id,
9871-
&self.channel_type_features(), &peer_state.latest_features, &open_channel_msg,
9872-
user_channel_id, &config, best_block_height, &self.logger, accept_0conf
9873-
).map_err(|err| MsgHandleErrInternal::from_chan_no_close(err, *temporary_channel_id)
9874-
).map(|mut channel| {
9875-
let logger = WithChannelContext::from(&self.logger, &channel.context, None);
9876-
let message_send_event = channel.accept_inbound_channel(&&logger).map(|msg| {
9873+
OpenChannelMessage::V1(open_channel_msg) => InboundV1Channel::new(
9874+
&self.fee_estimator,
9875+
&self.entropy_source,
9876+
&self.signer_provider,
9877+
*counterparty_node_id,
9878+
&self.channel_type_features(),
9879+
&peer_state.latest_features,
9880+
&open_channel_msg,
9881+
user_channel_id,
9882+
&config,
9883+
best_block_height,
9884+
&self.logger,
9885+
accept_0conf,
9886+
)
9887+
.map_err(|err| {
9888+
MsgHandleErrInternal::from_chan_no_close(err, *temporary_channel_id)
9889+
})
9890+
.map(|mut channel| {
9891+
let logger = WithChannelContext::from(&self.logger, &channel.context, None);
9892+
let message_send_event =
9893+
channel.accept_inbound_channel(&&logger).map(|msg| {
98779894
MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel {
98789895
node_id: *counterparty_node_id,
98799896
msg,
98809897
}
98819898
});
9882-
(*temporary_channel_id, Channel::from(channel), message_send_event)
9883-
})
9884-
},
9885-
OpenChannelMessage::V2(open_channel_msg) => {
9886-
PendingV2Channel::new_inbound(
9887-
&self.fee_estimator, &self.entropy_source, &self.signer_provider,
9888-
self.get_our_node_id(), *counterparty_node_id,
9889-
&self.channel_type_features(), &peer_state.latest_features,
9890-
&open_channel_msg,
9891-
user_channel_id, &config, best_block_height,
9892-
&self.logger,
9893-
).map_err(|e| {
9894-
let channel_id = open_channel_msg.common_fields.temporary_channel_id;
9895-
MsgHandleErrInternal::from_chan_no_close(e, channel_id)
9896-
}).map(|channel| {
9897-
let message_send_event = MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannelV2 {
9898-
node_id: channel.context.get_counterparty_node_id(),
9899-
msg: channel.accept_inbound_dual_funded_channel()
9900-
};
9901-
(channel.context.channel_id(), Channel::from(channel), Some(message_send_event))
9902-
})
9903-
},
9899+
(*temporary_channel_id, Channel::from(channel), message_send_event)
9900+
}),
9901+
OpenChannelMessage::V2(open_channel_msg) => PendingV2Channel::new_inbound(
9902+
&self.fee_estimator,
9903+
&self.entropy_source,
9904+
&self.signer_provider,
9905+
self.get_our_node_id(),
9906+
*counterparty_node_id,
9907+
&self.channel_type_features(),
9908+
&peer_state.latest_features,
9909+
&open_channel_msg,
9910+
user_channel_id,
9911+
&config,
9912+
best_block_height,
9913+
&self.logger,
9914+
)
9915+
.map_err(|e| {
9916+
let channel_id = open_channel_msg.common_fields.temporary_channel_id;
9917+
MsgHandleErrInternal::from_chan_no_close(e, channel_id)
9918+
})
9919+
.map(|channel| {
9920+
let message_send_event = MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannelV2 {
9921+
node_id: channel.context.get_counterparty_node_id(),
9922+
msg: channel.accept_inbound_dual_funded_channel(),
9923+
};
9924+
(
9925+
channel.context.channel_id(),
9926+
Channel::from(channel),
9927+
Some(message_send_event),
9928+
)
9929+
}),
99049930
}
99059931
},
99069932
None => {
99079933
let err_str = "No such channel awaiting to be accepted.".to_owned();
99089934
log_error!(logger, "{}", err_str);
99099935

99109936
return Err(APIError::APIMisuseError { err: err_str });
9911-
}
9937+
},
99129938
};
99139939

99149940
// We have to match below instead of map_err on the above as in the map_err closure the borrow checker
@@ -9919,13 +9945,19 @@ This indicates a bug inside LDK. Please report this error at https://github.com/
99199945
mem::drop(peer_state_lock);
99209946
mem::drop(per_peer_state);
99219947
// TODO(dunxen): Find/make less icky way to do this.
9922-
match handle_error!(self, Result::<(), MsgHandleErrInternal>::Err(err), *counterparty_node_id) {
9923-
Ok(_) => unreachable!("`handle_error` only returns Err as we've passed in an Err"),
9948+
match handle_error!(
9949+
self,
9950+
Result::<(), MsgHandleErrInternal>::Err(err),
9951+
*counterparty_node_id
9952+
) {
9953+
Ok(_) => {
9954+
unreachable!("`handle_error` only returns Err as we've passed in an Err")
9955+
},
99249956
Err(e) => {
99259957
return Err(APIError::ChannelUnavailable { err: e.err });
99269958
},
99279959
}
9928-
}
9960+
},
99299961
};
99309962

99319963
if accept_0conf {
@@ -9934,9 +9966,12 @@ This indicates a bug inside LDK. Please report this error at https://github.com/
99349966
} else if channel.funding().get_channel_type().requires_zero_conf() {
99359967
let send_msg_err_event = MessageSendEvent::HandleError {
99369968
node_id: channel.context().get_counterparty_node_id(),
9937-
action: msgs::ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage{
9938-
msg: msgs::ErrorMessage { channel_id: *temporary_channel_id, data: "No zero confirmation channels accepted".to_owned(), }
9939-
}
9969+
action: msgs::ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage {
9970+
msg: msgs::ErrorMessage {
9971+
channel_id: *temporary_channel_id,
9972+
data: "No zero confirmation channels accepted".to_owned(),
9973+
},
9974+
},
99409975
};
99419976
debug_assert!(peer_state.is_connected);
99429977
peer_state.pending_msg_events.push(send_msg_err_event);
@@ -9951,13 +9986,19 @@ This indicates a bug inside LDK. Please report this error at https://github.com/
99519986
if is_only_peer_channel && peers_without_funded_channels >= MAX_UNFUNDED_CHANNEL_PEERS {
99529987
let send_msg_err_event = MessageSendEvent::HandleError {
99539988
node_id: channel.context().get_counterparty_node_id(),
9954-
action: msgs::ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage{
9955-
msg: msgs::ErrorMessage { channel_id: *temporary_channel_id, data: "Have too many peers with unfunded channels, not accepting new ones".to_owned(), }
9956-
}
9989+
action: msgs::ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage {
9990+
msg: msgs::ErrorMessage {
9991+
channel_id: *temporary_channel_id,
9992+
data:
9993+
"Have too many peers with unfunded channels, not accepting new ones"
9994+
.to_owned(),
9995+
},
9996+
},
99579997
};
99589998
debug_assert!(peer_state.is_connected);
99599999
peer_state.pending_msg_events.push(send_msg_err_event);
9960-
let err_str = "Too many peers with unfunded channels, refusing to accept new ones".to_owned();
10000+
let err_str =
10001+
"Too many peers with unfunded channels, refusing to accept new ones".to_owned();
996110002
log_error!(logger, "{}", err_str);
996210003

996310004
return Err(APIError::APIMisuseError { err: err_str });
@@ -13671,7 +13712,6 @@ where
1367113712
provided_init_features(&self.config.read().unwrap())
1367213713
}
1367313714

13674-
#[rustfmt::skip]
1367513715
fn peer_disconnected(&self, counterparty_node_id: PublicKey) {
1367613716
let _persistence_guard = PersistenceNotifierGuard::optionally_notify(self, || {
1367713717
let mut splice_failed_events = Vec::new();
@@ -13779,7 +13819,10 @@ where
1377913819
debug_assert!(peer_state.is_connected, "A disconnected peer cannot disconnect");
1378013820
peer_state.is_connected = false;
1378113821
peer_state.ok_to_remove(true)
13782-
} else { debug_assert!(false, "Unconnected peer disconnected"); true }
13822+
} else {
13823+
debug_assert!(false, "Unconnected peer disconnected");
13824+
true
13825+
}
1378313826
};
1378413827
if remove_peer {
1378513828
per_peer_state.remove(&counterparty_node_id);
@@ -13804,11 +13847,16 @@ where
1380413847
});
1380513848
}
1380613849

13807-
#[rustfmt::skip]
13808-
fn peer_connected(&self, counterparty_node_id: PublicKey, init_msg: &msgs::Init, inbound: bool) -> Result<(), ()> {
13850+
fn peer_connected(
13851+
&self, counterparty_node_id: PublicKey, init_msg: &msgs::Init, inbound: bool,
13852+
) -> Result<(), ()> {
1380913853
let logger = WithContext::from(&self.logger, Some(counterparty_node_id), None, None);
1381013854
if !init_msg.features.supports_static_remote_key() {
13811-
log_debug!(logger, "Peer {} does not support static remote key, disconnecting", log_pubkey!(counterparty_node_id));
13855+
log_debug!(
13856+
logger,
13857+
"Peer {} does not support static remote key, disconnecting",
13858+
log_pubkey!(counterparty_node_id)
13859+
);
1381213860
return Err(());
1381313861
}
1381413862

@@ -13819,8 +13867,10 @@ where
1381913867
// peer immediately (as long as it doesn't have funded channels). If we have a bunch of
1382013868
// unfunded channels taking up space in memory for disconnected peers, we still let new
1382113869
// peers connect, but we'll reject new channels from them.
13822-
let connected_peers_without_funded_channels = self.peers_without_funded_channels(|node| node.is_connected);
13823-
let inbound_peer_limited = inbound && connected_peers_without_funded_channels >= MAX_NO_CHANNEL_PEERS;
13870+
let connected_peers_without_funded_channels =
13871+
self.peers_without_funded_channels(|node| node.is_connected);
13872+
let inbound_peer_limited =
13873+
inbound && connected_peers_without_funded_channels >= MAX_NO_CHANNEL_PEERS;
1382413874

1382513875
{
1382613876
let mut peer_state_lock = self.per_peer_state.write().unwrap();
@@ -13848,9 +13898,9 @@ where
1384813898
peer_state.latest_features = init_msg.features.clone();
1384913899

1385013900
let best_block_height = self.best_block.read().unwrap().height;
13851-
if inbound_peer_limited &&
13852-
Self::unfunded_channel_count(&*peer_state, best_block_height) ==
13853-
peer_state.channel_by_id.len()
13901+
if inbound_peer_limited
13902+
&& Self::unfunded_channel_count(&*peer_state, best_block_height)
13903+
== peer_state.channel_by_id.len()
1385413904
{
1385513905
res = Err(());
1385613906
return NotifyOption::SkipPersistNoEvents;
@@ -13859,7 +13909,10 @@ where
1385913909
debug_assert!(peer_state.pending_msg_events.is_empty());
1386013910
peer_state.pending_msg_events.clear();
1386113911

13862-
debug_assert!(!peer_state.is_connected, "A peer shouldn't be connected twice");
13912+
debug_assert!(
13913+
!peer_state.is_connected,
13914+
"A peer shouldn't be connected twice"
13915+
);
1386313916
peer_state.is_connected = true;
1386413917
},
1386513918
}
@@ -13876,27 +13929,26 @@ where
1387613929
if !peer_state.peer_storage.is_empty() {
1387713930
pending_msg_events.push(MessageSendEvent::SendPeerStorageRetrieval {
1387813931
node_id: counterparty_node_id.clone(),
13879-
msg: msgs::PeerStorageRetrieval {
13880-
data: peer_state.peer_storage.clone()
13881-
},
13932+
msg: msgs::PeerStorageRetrieval { data: peer_state.peer_storage.clone() },
1388213933
});
1388313934
}
1388413935

1388513936
for (_, chan) in peer_state.channel_by_id.iter_mut() {
1388613937
let logger = WithChannelContext::from(&self.logger, &chan.context(), None);
1388713938
match chan.peer_connected_get_handshake(self.chain_hash, &&logger) {
13888-
ReconnectionMsg::Reestablish(msg) =>
13939+
ReconnectionMsg::Reestablish(msg) => {
1388913940
pending_msg_events.push(MessageSendEvent::SendChannelReestablish {
1389013941
node_id: chan.context().get_counterparty_node_id(),
1389113942
msg,
13892-
}),
13893-
ReconnectionMsg::Open(OpenChannelMessage::V1(msg)) =>
13894-
pending_msg_events.push(MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel {
13943+
})
13944+
},
13945+
ReconnectionMsg::Open(OpenChannelMessage::V1(msg)) => pending_msg_events
13946+
.push(MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel {
1389513947
node_id: chan.context().get_counterparty_node_id(),
1389613948
msg,
1389713949
}),
13898-
ReconnectionMsg::Open(OpenChannelMessage::V2(msg)) =>
13899-
pending_msg_events.push(MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannelV2 {
13950+
ReconnectionMsg::Open(OpenChannelMessage::V2(msg)) => pending_msg_events
13951+
.push(MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannelV2 {
1390013952
node_id: chan.context().get_counterparty_node_id(),
1390113953
msg,
1390213954
}),

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)