Summary
Define transaction boundary patterns so future multi-step persistence workflows can be implemented safely and consistently.
Context
As the backend grows into payments, wallets, and audit-sensitive operations, some flows will require multi-step database consistency guarantees.
Scope
- Define transaction boundary patterns for repositories/services
- Document where transactional coordination should live
- Keep the design modular and contributor-friendly
- Prepare for future multi-entity workflows
Acceptance Criteria
- The codebase has a clear pattern for transactional persistence workflows
- Repository and service responsibilities are documented more clearly
- The design supports future multi-step financial workflows
- Contributors can implement transaction-safe features more predictably
Out of Scope
- Full payment settlement implementation
- Cross-service distributed transactions
Dependencies
Depends on #7 and should align with #8.
Repository boundaries and real PostgreSQL-backed persistence should exist before transaction coordination patterns are finalized.
Summary
Define transaction boundary patterns so future multi-step persistence workflows can be implemented safely and consistently.
Context
As the backend grows into payments, wallets, and audit-sensitive operations, some flows will require multi-step database consistency guarantees.
Scope
Acceptance Criteria
Out of Scope
Dependencies
Depends on #7 and should align with #8.
Repository boundaries and real PostgreSQL-backed persistence should exist before transaction coordination patterns are finalized.