Added safe start#363
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Added safe-start support
- Improves code readability in main.go by formatting function calls with multiple parameters - Reverts kind node versions to slightly older versions (1.31.12, 1.32.8, 1.33.4, 1.34.0) - Fixes grammatical error in log message for RBAC permissions - Removes commented out code in Makefile
nolancon
approved these changes
Oct 20, 2025
Contributor
Author
|
@nolancon Unfortunately, I am not a maintainer. I can't merge this PR. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Added safe-start support
See #360 for initial review, PR was closed during rebase process.
Added safe-start support
Description of your changes
Added safe-start support
I have:
make reviewableto ensure this PR is ready for review.make ceph-chainsawto validate these changes against Ceph. This step is not always necessary. However, for changes related to S3 calls it is sensible to validate against an actual Ceph cluster. Localstack is used in our CI Chainsaw suite for convenience and there can be disparity in S3 behaviours betwee it and Ceph. Seedocs/TESTING.mdfor information on how to run tests against a Ceph cluster.backport release-x.ylabels to auto-backport this PR if necessary.How has this code been tested