Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FEAT] Rename repository to reflect upstream project name #93

Open
1 task done
rig0a opened this issue Jan 13, 2025 · 3 comments
Open
1 task done

[FEAT] Rename repository to reflect upstream project name #93

rig0a opened this issue Jan 13, 2025 · 3 comments

Comments

@rig0a
Copy link

rig0a commented Jan 13, 2025

Is this a new feature request?

  • I have searched the existing issues

Wanted change

Rename the repository to reflect the upstream project - https://github.com/owntone/owntone-server

Reason for change

The upstream project was renamed at release 28.0, dated 22/05/2021

This repository was modified to reflect that upstream change in PR #51, but this image and repo retain the old name docker-daapd; I would be in favour of updating the name as the software offers more than just a DAAP server

Proposed code change

I do not know what precedent exists for linuxserver.io to rename existing containers

I assume the reason it hasn't been done is it creates a breaking change for end users

Would this only be acheivable by deprecating docker-daapd and creating a new docker-owntone as a replacement?

Copy link

Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the relevant issue templates, or risk having this issue marked as invalid.

@aptalca
Copy link
Member

aptalca commented Jan 13, 2025

This image has been on the verge of deprecation for a long time now. No one on the team uses it, including the current maintainer. That's why we never published it under its new name.

@ejurgensen
Copy link

There is an official image now, so sounds like a good idea to deprecate this

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: Issues
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants