[FEAT] how to support Arch AUR packages

[kangaroo1122]

Is this a new feature request?

• I have searched the existing issues

Wanted change

I want to use the pycharm package from the Arch AUR repository instead of the official pycharm-community-edition.

Reason for change

want to use Ultimate Edition

Proposed code change

No response

[github-actions]

Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the relevant issue templates, or risk having this issue marked as invalid.

[thelamer]

We ingest the community edition from the Arch repos.

Though we have other AUR containers like Citron, you could just swap out the citron for this https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pycharm

https://github.com/linuxserver/docker-citron/blob/master/Dockerfile

And test building it, but in general I am always cautious about putting any software that is behind a key or paywall. You get into weird legal gray areas, and while in this case it would likely not be an issue it is just kind of a general rule. We want open source first and foremost, than you have hopefully non malicious Linux freeware packaged by trusted names, at the bottom of that list is paywalled stuff.

[kangaroo1122]

We ingest the community edition from the Arch repos.

Though we have other AUR containers like Citron, you could just swap out the citron for this https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pycharm

https://github.com/linuxserver/docker-citron/blob/master/Dockerfile

And test building it, but in general I am always cautious about putting any software that is behind a key or paywall. You get into weird legal gray areas, and while in this case it would likely not be an issue it is just kind of a general rule. We want open source first and foremost, than you have hopefully non malicious Linux freeware packaged by trusted names, at the bottom of that list is paywalled stuff.

Yes, I agree with your viewpoint, and thank you for your reply. I'll give it a try

[kangaroo1122]

it's worked,thx