-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 16
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
start publishing ops updates to the website #363
Comments
@nkinkade @robertodauria @georgiamoon |
@critzo: Do you mean a new public Slack channel? I don't have a strong opinion about this. I suppose I slightly lean toward thinking that publishing Ops updates on the website might be overkill. I'm fine with the existing ops@ email group, or with using some other update channels like Slack. |
@critzo: I think it would be nice to have a "Status" page (mostly autogenerated and low-maintenance, leveraging our monitoring stack, something like the mlab-ns map but in a different format) where we can also publish updates - e.g. announce new/retired sites, maintenance, etc. Was this what you had in mind? |
@nkinkade No, I don't think a Slack channel. We (@georgiamoon , @mehtab11 ) have been discussing options for new support infrastructure & tools -- currently researching CRM and ticketing systems, and we've discussed spinning up a Discourse site to replace the various Google groups. I was thinking about a future, not yet deployed channel in the Discourse site. I agree that publishing ops updates to the website is more hassle than it's worth, so I'm thinking we can plan for that and leave this issue stale or close it. |
@robertodauria I agree. I've opened a couple new issues which I think would be awesome to work on when we have time #492 #493 -- Let me know what you think. I've started work on #492 but not sure about how to do the other one. |
I like to think of our blog as a public history of activity, so I think it's important that we represent operational changes there as well. It can be something more auto-generated, or literally the same thing that we send over email, but it gives it more public access. |
OK Sounds good. @robertodauria and @nkinkade let's just figure out a workflow that gets anything sent to ops@ to also be a blog post. |
Reviving this stale issue @laiyi-ohlsen @phillipa in light of the recent discussion about publishing incident reports. |
No description provided.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: