We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. Weβll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
2025-03-25 09:06:04.298 | INFO | app.llm:ask_tool:760 - π Has content attr: True 2025-03-25 09:06:04.298 | INFO | app.llm:ask_tool:762 - π Content value: 2025-03-25 09:26:35.543 | INFO | app.agent.toolcall:think:96 - β¨ Manus's thoughts:
using resoning_content in toolcall.py
self.tool_calls = tool_calls = ( response.tool_calls if response and response.tool_calls else [] ) #! checking is deepseek is_deepseek = hasattr(self.llm, 'model') and 'deepseek' in self.llm.model.lower() content = "" if response: if is_deepseek and hasattr(response, 'reasoning_content'): content = response.reasoning_content logger.info(f"yfπ Using reasoning_content from deepseek model: {content[:100]}...") else: content = response.content if hasattr(response, 'content') else ""
pip install -r requirements.txt
pip install -e .
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
https://github.com/mannaandpoem/OpenManus/pull/936/files
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Bug Description
2025-03-25 09:06:04.298 | INFO | app.llm:ask_tool:760 - π Has content attr: True
2025-03-25 09:06:04.298 | INFO | app.llm:ask_tool:762 - π Content value:
2025-03-25 09:26:35.543 | INFO | app.agent.toolcall:think:96 - β¨ Manus's thoughts:
Bug solved method
using resoning_content in toolcall.py
Environment information
pip install -r requirements.txt
orpip install -e .
):Extra information
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: