You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
manifest+docs: the recommended spelling is the namespace on the key, and the advisory teaches it
An entry names a package and then says which version of it, so the namespace
belongs to the name: "xim:picolibc-riscv" = "1.8.12". Official packages use
that form.
The advisory for the superseded deps key suggested the other one. That form is
accepted and is what the materialised .xlings.json carries — a key there is an
xvm target and the scope qualifies the version — but it is the file's
vocabulary, not the author's. A suggestion is copied, so one that teaches the
non-recommended form pushes the convention the wrong way.
XlingsEntry::authored_line is the recommended spelling and the advisory's only
source for it, so the message and the documentation cannot drift. docs/05 states
the form and why the other is still accepted; docs/13 and the project-subos
example follow. Both languages.
Parsing is unchanged, and so is the materialised file.
0 commit comments