Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Bug]: Major downgrade bug after 0.3.0 to 1.2.0 #1722

Open
1 of 3 tasks
maolaaaa opened this issue Feb 19, 2025 · 3 comments
Open
1 of 3 tasks

[Bug]: Major downgrade bug after 0.3.0 to 1.2.0 #1722

maolaaaa opened this issue Feb 19, 2025 · 3 comments
Labels
awaiting_response Maintainers or community have suggested solutions or requested info, awaiting filer response bug Something isn't working triage Default label assignment, indicates new issue needs reviewed by a maintainer

Comments

@maolaaaa
Copy link

Do you need to file an issue?

  • I have searched the existing issues and this bug is not already filed.
  • My model is hosted on OpenAI or Azure. If not, please look at the "model providers" issue and don't file a new one here.
  • I believe this is a legitimate bug, not just a question. If this is a question, please use the Discussions area.

Describe the bug

When running my multi-file project with the latest version of GraphRAG, there are often unexpected interruptions due to llm instability.
When I tried to use cache to recover the data, I found that no matter using resume + timestamp (e.g. graphrag index --root --resume 20250214-171757 (the timestamp is in indexing-engine.log)) or defaulting to cache, I couldn't do the cache recovery work correctly. to restore the cache.
After re-downloading v0.3.0, I found that when interrupting either accidentally or manually by ctrl+C, I can run python -m graphrag.index --root again to recover the cache, probably due to the collaborator's changes.

Steps to reproduce

No response

Expected Behavior

No response

GraphRAG Config Used

# Paste your config here

Logs and screenshots

No response

Additional Information

  • GraphRAG Version:
  • Operating System:
  • Python Version:
  • Related Issues:
@maolaaaa maolaaaa added bug Something isn't working triage Default label assignment, indicates new issue needs reviewed by a maintainer labels Feb 19, 2025
@schauerstoff
Copy link

same here, but I don't even see the "20250214-171757" timestamp in the logs. According to previous instructions how to resume, this should be the name of a subfolder of the cache directory, but I don't see them being created in version 1.2.0.

@shawn-maxiao
Copy link

same here, but I don't even see the "20250214-171757" timestamp in the logs. According to previous instructions how to resume, this should be the name of a subfolder of the cache directory, but I don't see them being created in version 1.2.0.

yes. No timestamp named folder created in 1.2.0. Very strange.

@natoverse
Copy link
Collaborator

We've been working through a number of issues since adopting fnllm for API call management. 2.0.0 was just released, which we believe resolves these issues.

@natoverse natoverse added the awaiting_response Maintainers or community have suggested solutions or requested info, awaiting filer response label Feb 26, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
awaiting_response Maintainers or community have suggested solutions or requested info, awaiting filer response bug Something isn't working triage Default label assignment, indicates new issue needs reviewed by a maintainer
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants