-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 291
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Using Istanbul for instrumentation (instead of V8) #2777
Comments
I believe this is related to test-runner-playwright which could be fixed via #2779. If you set Note that using the test-runner-chrome which uses puppeteer will have this work, it is just the playwright runner that is broken. |
I've tried the repo above with the Chrome runner, Puppeteer runner and Playwright runner. All of them show the exact same behaviour. When If you've got an example showing otherwise though I'd love to see it, maybe my setup is wrong. Or if you see something wrong with how I did it, I'd love to hear that either - I just want to get this resolved. |
The key in your sample repo in |
I don't know how I missed that... thank you so much! In that case, I think you're right and this should be fixed by #2779. |
Hi!
I've recently moved my project from Karma to web-test-runner. I'm having trouble with coverage reports (wildly inaccurate reports are produced), though, so I decided to try the solution in #1715. However, that specific solution doesn't seem to work for my use case (TypeScript with decorators), and the one in the docs doesn't seem to produce anything different.
I've experimented a little bit and discovered that seeing
nativeInstrumentation
to false has no impact - web-test-runner seems to be using native instrumentation regardless of whether or not it's set to true (the first commit shows how it runs coverage regardless of the setting; the second commit shows the plugin having zero impact). Trying the code in the docs with another browser (both webkit and Firefox) produces no code coverage, which shows it's not being run at all (makes sense considering the above). Is there something I'm missing about how to use web-test-runner with custom instrumentation, or is there something broken?This repo shows a very basic reproduction of both of those issues (just run
npm install
andnpm run test
). I've verified that the Istanbul plugin is being called using some logging, but for some reason no coverage report is being outputted, which seems like a web-test-runner issue. I'd be happy to do some more digging and see if I can find where it's going wrong, but if everything's behaving as intended and I misunderstood or the code in the docs is just outdated, it'd be great to hear.Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: