Skip to content

Conversation

@dignifiedquire
Copy link
Member

Closes #66,#67

Copy link
Member

@jbenet jbenet left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. I haven't verified the codes are all right-- do you want me to? (I can)

We should have md5 and the identity hash function (identity = just the same value as the input)

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Feb 26, 2017

If the multihash table is now a subset of the multicodec table, can we remove it here?

@dignifiedquire
Copy link
Member Author

@jbenet codes are copied 1:1 from multicodes table and seem to match the implementation on my checks, so I think we ar good there.

@dignifiedquire dignifiedquire merged commit 2df4b06 into master Feb 26, 2017
@dignifiedquire dignifiedquire deleted the sync-table branch February 26, 2017 17:08
@dignifiedquire
Copy link
Member Author

@jbenet md5 is tracked in #44. Lets move identity to a new discussion.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants