Add a print subcommand
#140
Draft
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
kurtmckee
force-pushed
the
print-command-issue-115
branch
from
c657d66 to
666589c
Compare
kurtmckee
force-pushed
the
print-command-issue-115
branch
from
666589c to
d94d3b3
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Note
Tests are failing on Windows due to newline behavior. I'll work to resolve this after hours.
This introduces a
printsubcommand that can generate a changelog entry from fragments (similar tocollect) or extract an existing entry from the changelog by specifying a--version.To accommodate environments that do not support output redirection (like tox), an
--outputargument can be used to write directly to a file. Platform-specific newlines are used by default, but if the changelog is read then its newlines are respected when writing the new file.Tests and documentation are added, and
make boteditswas run. Note that it was necessary to modify the CLI runner, which was incorrectly mixing STDOUT and STDERR streams and was adding additional newlines to the output.I'll monitor CI to confirm whether the test suite passes (or fails, if it's caused by these changes).
Closes #115