Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Underestimation of distance to closest obstacles when there are unobserved grids in an ESDF map #45

Open
jwkodes opened this issue Mar 17, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@jwkodes
Copy link

jwkodes commented Mar 17, 2024

The value of esdf at a certain grid indicates the euclidean distance to the nearest observed obstacle. If say there is an object that is entirely textureless and becomes unobserved in depth maps, the grids that are in this obstacle will not be allocated, and the grids outside and around this obstacle will tend to underestimate the true distance to an actual obstacle.

Is there a easy way to deal with this issue? For example, on top of having the euclidean signed distance to the nearest observed obstacle, is there also a way to obtain the distance to the nearest unobserved grid?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant